18.12.2012 Views

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Interative Hull Atlas: www.hullpublichealth.org/Pages/hull_atlas.htm More information: www.jsnaonline.org and www.hullpublichealth.org<br />

10.2.1.3 Diagnosed Cases Since April 2003<br />

As part of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), general practices compile<br />

disease and medical condition registers. From these registers, the prevalence of these<br />

various conditions can be estimated. However, there may be a high proportion of<br />

patients who have the disease or medical condition, but it is undiagnosed and the<br />

patient is not included on the register(s). Furthermore, the figures are unadjusted for<br />

influencing factors, such as the age of the patients and deprivation. Practices with a<br />

high proportion of elderly patients and practices in the most deprived areas will tend to<br />

have a higher level of disease, as a result practices have been grouped into groups with<br />

similar age and deprivation <strong>profile</strong>s (see section 3.3.3.3 on page 47). See section<br />

12.13 on page 782 for more information on QOF and issues associated with presenting<br />

the this type of information at practice level. Also see Table 28 and Table 49 for mean<br />

age of patients and mean deprivation scores for each practice (which will influence the<br />

prevalence on the disease registers). One such register is for cancer, and relates to<br />

patients who have been diagnosed with cancer since 1 st April 2003.<br />

Table 230 presents the percentage of patients on the cancer disease register for all the<br />

general practices in Hull for 2009/10. This refers to all patients who have been<br />

diagnosed with cancer since 1 st April 2003. The latest list size refers to the registered<br />

population as at 1 st January 2010, but the number and prevalence on the disease<br />

register is as at 31 st March 2010 (the same definitions used in QOF), and this means<br />

that the prevalence can be biased if large population changes have occurred over this<br />

three month period (e.g. Y02747, Y02786, Y02896 and Y02748 all opened between 5 th<br />

October 2009 and 11 th January 2010).<br />

Table 230: Percentage of patients who have been diagnosed cancer since 1 st April 2003<br />

as at 2009/10<br />

Practice<br />

code<br />

Practice name Registered<br />

population<br />

(Jan 10)<br />

Number (%) of patients<br />

diagnosed with cancer since 1 st<br />

April 2003 as at 2009/10<br />

Number Percentage<br />

B81035 Dr Sande & Partners 6,114 136 2.22<br />

B81056 Springhead Med Centr 13,489 199 1.48<br />

B81104 Dr J K Nayar 7,721 18 0.23<br />

B81635 Dr G Dave 2,967 31 1.04<br />

B81662 Mizzen Road Surgery 1,856 25 1.35<br />

Y01200 The Calvert Practice 1,765 16 0.91<br />

Y02747 Kingswood Surgery 902 2 0.22<br />

B81020 Dr Mitchell & Partners 7,512 119 1.58<br />

B81021 Faith House Surgery 7,257 75 1.03<br />

B81075 Dr M K Mallik 2,263 23 1.02<br />

B81085 Dr Richardson & Partrs 5,299 76 1.43<br />

B81094 Dr A K Datta 1,925 27 1.40<br />

B81095 Dr Cook 4,242 80 1.89<br />

B81097 Dr R D Yagnik 1,688 14 0.83<br />

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Foundation Profile – Hull Health Profile: Release 3. March 2011. 506

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!