joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

Interative Hull Atlas: www.hullpublichealth.org/Pages/hull_atlas.htm More information: www.jsnaonline.org and www.hullpublichealth.org
Code Latest
pop
18+
Number and prevalence on CKD QOF register over time
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10
N % N % N % N %
B81054 8,681 276 2.45 390 4.29 440 4.86 466 5.37
B81058 7,065 106 1.13 167 2.26 192 2.65 227 3.21
B81066 1,942 65 2.69 96 4.99 118 5.90 127 6.54
B81080 1,795 47 1.82 89 4.65 96 5.22 107 5.96
B81616 1,954 1 0.04 1 0.05 148 7.37 138 7.06
B81002 2,691 56 1.84 65 3.02 74 3.38 127 4.72
B81112 2,484 68 1.85 64 2.49 69 2.65 68 2.74
B81119 3,307 34 0.76 32 0.95 34 0.98 35 1.06
B81634 2,192 74 2.37 88 3.87 79 3.52 69 3.15
B81674 1,591 46 2.55 53 3.71 53 3.45 83 5.22
B81675 7,012 69 1.44 156 3.82 166 2.28 313 4.46
B81685 1,735 38 1.47 48 2.63 48 2.65 49 2.82
B81688 1,446 16 0.77 32 2.14 40 2.64 49 3.39
Y02344 1,201 N/A N/A N/A N/A 67 4.45 39 3.25
B81027 4,661 150 2.53 214 4.55 243 5.12 260 5.58
B81040 12,436 48 0.29 66 0.51 308 2.40 301 2.42
B81047 5,828 58 0.79 94 1.62 104 1.79 160 2.75
B81089 2,580 59 1.77 85 3.39 124 4.78 112 4.34
B81631 2,329 47 1.48 55 2.41 59 2.49 66 2.83
B81683 1,217 55 3.61 58 5.34 67 5.88 69 5.67
Y02896 267 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 1.49
B81017 5,440 96 1.33 170 2.92 176 3.18 173 3.18
B81018 4,753 86 1.27 59 1.20 53 1.09 72 1.51
B81032 2,007 11 0.40 29 1.31 35 1.62 40 1.99
B81046 6,620 196 2.18 196 3.01 187 2.82 217 3.28
B81692 1,560 2 0.11 2 0.13 4 0.26 12 0.77
Y00955 1,968 29 1.75 34 1.97 42 2.12 47 2.39
Y02748 39 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6 15.38
Doncaster PCT has created a model which can be used to produce the estimated
number of people with diagnosed CKD (Doncaster PCT 2008). In general when such
models have been produced, the model is based on research undertaken elsewhere in
the UK examining the prevalence of diagnosed disease in the community, which has
then been modelled and applied to different populations such as those living in a
particular PCT area. Therefore, the accuracy of the estimates depend on the quality of
the initial research and the modelling itself. If the original research did not include very
deprived areas, it is very difficult to generalise and apply the model to very deprived
areas like Hull. Furthermore, there are many reasons why the prevalence could differ
among practices (see section 12.13 on page 782 for more information). Further
information about problems associated with models can be found in the Association of
Public Health Observatories Technical Briefing (Association of Public Health
Observatories 2011) and in section 12.1 on page 770. Therefore, just because
practices have a particularly low prevalence or a relatively large difference between the
registers and the model, it does not necessarily mean that they are performing badly in
any way relative to other general practices. Nevertheless, a comparison of the
differences between the modelled prevalence and the practice list registers can act as a
starting point for investigation. Practices with a low prevalence or a relatively large
Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Foundation Profile – Hull Health Profile: Release 3. March 2011. 595