18.12.2012 Views

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Interative Hull Atlas: www.hullpublichealth.org/Pages/hull_atlas.htm More information: www.jsnaonline.org and www.hullpublichealth.org<br />

same as the national average (ranked 46 th ), similarly the percentage of CHD patients<br />

with cholesterol measured within the last 15 months which was 5mmol/l or lower for<br />

2008/2009 was the same as England (ranked 81 st ).<br />

Overall, circulatory disease outcomes were worse for Hull compared to England,<br />

although not substantially different from other comparators. Spend for 2008/2009 was<br />

slightly higher in Hull compared to England, but lower than the Industrial Hinterlands<br />

average.<br />

Table 191: Circulatory disease outcomes in Y&H PHO programme budgeting tool<br />

Area U75 DSR all<br />

circulatory<br />

2006-08<br />

CHD<br />

patients<br />

with blood<br />

pressure<br />

≤150/90,<br />

2008/09<br />

U75 DSR<br />

CHD<br />

2006-08<br />

U75 DSR MI<br />

2006-08<br />

CHD<br />

patients<br />

with<br />

cholesterol<br />

≤5mmol/l,<br />

2008/09<br />

U75 DSR<br />

stroke<br />

2006-08<br />

DSR Rnk % Rnk DSR Rnk DSR Rnk % Rnk DSR Rnk<br />

England 74.8 90 42.3 17.7 82 13.7<br />

Ind Hinterlands 92.6 90 54.7 22.8 83 16.7<br />

Hull* 104.6 133 90 46 63.1 139 26.1 129 82 81 20.5 140<br />

North Tyneside* 87.6 100 90 72 52.9 113 16.1 58 83 50 14.8 85<br />

Hartlepool* 95.0 122 90 83 50.2 96 29.0 138 84 20 21.9 147<br />

Plymouth 82.3 83 89 118 49.0 90 13.9 40 85 9 11.6 35<br />

Salford 108.1 139 91 18 63.1 140 28.1 132 83 39 18.5 128<br />

Knowsley* 115.1 145 90 33 69.3 145 28.1 133 79 134 21.9 146<br />

Darlington* 86.5 95 90 69 48.8 89 25.2 122 86 4 18.0 123<br />

Gateshead* 90.0 111 89 113 54.8 118 17.2 70 85 7 13.5 64<br />

South Tyneside* 91.6 116 90 54 55.3 120 13.9 39 84 22 14.8 84<br />

Sunderland* 88.9 106 91 27 51.9 110 20.6 94 86 3 14.5 81<br />

Middlesbrough* 95.8 126 90 36 58.0 131 30.2 144 82 68 19.6 137<br />

Tameside&Glos* 107.8 138 89 116 66.7 143 18.9 88 82 72 18.3 125<br />

Coventry 85.6 92 88 135 48.2 87 24.4 117 80 123 14.1 73<br />

Wolverhampton 92.3 117 87 148 49.6 94 24.5 118 77 147 18.8 130<br />

Derby City 87.3 99 90 45 51.1 104 18.7 86 86 2 14.9 87<br />

County Durham* 86.8 96 90 81 52.5 112 22.0 101 82 83 16.1 104<br />

Sefton* 79.9 80 89 121 46.8 84 21.1 98 81 93 16.1 103<br />

Wirral* 79.4 77 90 48 44.9 75 25.9 125 81 107 15.9 98<br />

Halton&St Hlens* 101.2 132 90 63 60.0 134 28.3 134 81 106 17.9 120<br />

Leicester City 112.6 144 89 122 71.3 148 23.7 112 80 120 18.9 131<br />

Sandwell 110.9 142 89 105 69.5 146 35.9 151 83 52 21.2 144<br />

Stoke on Trent* 90.0 110 89 112 51.1 103 15.1 52 83 58 16.2 105<br />

Redcar&Clvl‟d* 87.9 102 91 22 50.5 99 29.9 143 85 11 16.0 100<br />

NE Lincolnshire 94.6 120 89 111 56.4 124 29.4 141 83 55 15.7 96<br />

*Within Industrial Hinterlands group.<br />

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Foundation Profile – Hull Health Profile: Release 3. March 2011. 446

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!