18.12.2012 Views

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Interative Hull Atlas: www.hullpublichealth.org/Pages/hull_atlas.htm More information: www.jsnaonline.org and www.hullpublichealth.org<br />

Number of girls<br />

Figure 100: BMI classification for year R and year 6 girls (numbers in paired analysis)<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

BMI classification in year 6 (aged 10-11 years) measured 2007/2008<br />

Underweight Desirable weight Overweight Obese<br />

Underweight Desirable weight Overweight Obese<br />

BMI classification in year R (aged 4-5 years) measured 2001/2002<br />

Table 120 and Table 121 give the information above in a different format, illustrating the<br />

percentage of children who were underweight, desirable weight, overweight or obese at<br />

year 6 depending on their weight classification six years earlier in year R. These tables as<br />

well as the figures above illustrate the relationship between overweight or obesity at year R<br />

and overweight or obesity at year 6.<br />

Of the 105 boys who were underweight at year R, 76.2% of them were within the desirable<br />

weight classification, 7.6% were overweight and 5.7% were obese at year 6. This<br />

illustrates the wide variation in weight measurements and classifications with a few boys<br />

moving from underweight to obese in six years. A higher percentage of Year R boys who<br />

were desirable weight in year R were classified as overweight or obese in year 6, and this<br />

pattern was repeated for overweight and obese Year R boys. Almost 70% of the 189 boys<br />

who were classified as obese in year R were still classified as obese in year 6. None of the<br />

boys who were classified as overweight or obese in year R were classified as underweight<br />

at year 6, but a sizeable percentage were classified as having desirable weight at year 6<br />

with 40% of the 255 overweight boys and 14% of the 189 obese boys in year R having<br />

desirable weight in year 6. Thus, whilst there is a relatively strong association between<br />

weight classification at year R and at year 6, there is considerable variation. Programmes<br />

for reducing overweight and obesity in year 6 children should not concentrate on those who<br />

were overweight or obese in year R. Similarly, children who were overweight or obese in<br />

year R may no longer have a problem with their weight in year 6.<br />

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Foundation Profile – Hull Health Profile: Release 3. March 2011. 290

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!