18.12.2012 Views

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Interative Hull Atlas: www.hullpublichealth.org/Pages/hull_atlas.htm More information: www.jsnaonline.org and www.hullpublichealth.org<br />

of deaths is very small, in fact, there is only one extra death in area B. Even if these two<br />

areas had exactly the same underlying mortality rate, one would not expect that exactly<br />

the same number of deaths to occur every single year in each area; there will be some<br />

natural variation over time and between the two areas. So it is reasonable to expect the<br />

number of deaths to vary over time in the two areas, and be zero, one or two in the<br />

areas for most years. Presenting confidence intervals (CIs) (see section 12.5 on page<br />

775) are useful in virtually all cases, but CIs are even more useful when there is a<br />

problem with small numbers. In this example, one would find that the CIs are wide, and<br />

this would indicate that the numbers are too small to provide a good estimate of the<br />

underlying statistic. In the above case the 95% confidence intervals are 1 to 464 deaths<br />

per 100,000 persons for area A and 19 to 602 deaths per 100,000 persons for area B.<br />

This represents a very wide confidence interval, and means that the estimate is not<br />

useful (it is likely that one would have guessed that the estimate fell between 1 and 464<br />

deaths per 100,000 persons in area A before any analysis of the data was completed).<br />

Therefore, even if a mortality rate appears to be substantially higher in one area<br />

compared to another, the number of deaths should be considered (and the width of the<br />

95% confidence interval if presented). If the numbers of deaths are relatively small, then<br />

the results should be interpreted very cautiously.<br />

12.8 Percentiles, Quartiles, Quintiles and Medians<br />

Percentiles divide a distribution of ordered numerical values into groups. The 10 th<br />

percentile is the value of a numerical variable for which 10% of the people or sample of<br />

values fall below. For example, if from a survey of employees at a particular company<br />

the 10 th percentile for annual income is £10,000, then this would mean that 10% of the<br />

employees for this particular company were earning £10,000 or less. Quintiles and<br />

quartiles are alternative names for specific percentiles. The quintiles divide the sample<br />

or observations or people into five groups whereas the quartiles divide the observations<br />

into four groups. The Index of Multiple Deprivation is frequently divided into quintiles<br />

usually based on the national distribution of all the IMD scores across the entire lower<br />

layer super output areas (LLSOAs; geographical areas – with a mean of 1,500 residents<br />

– on which the IMD scores are calculated). As Hull is much more deprived than<br />

England with none of the 163 LLSOAs within the least deprived national quintile and<br />

very few in the second least deprived national quintile, the IMD scores are often divided<br />

into local quintiles for Hull. Thus, the most deprived quintile of areas represents the<br />

20% most deprived areas. The quartiles divide the observations into four groups, and<br />

the cut-offs are generally referred to as the lower quartile, median and upper quartile.<br />

Thus 25% of all the observations have a value equal to the lower quartile or less, 25%<br />

between the lower quartile and the median, etc, and half of the observations have a<br />

value of the median or less (or the median or more). The median is frequently used to<br />

illustrate the „typical‟ or „middle‟ value if the observations have a skewed distribution<br />

where there are a small number of observations that have a particularly high value. The<br />

mean (arithmetic average) is not the best measure of the „typical‟ value if the<br />

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Foundation Profile – Hull Health Profile: Release 3. March 2011. 777

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!