18.12.2012 Views

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Interative Hull Atlas: www.hullpublichealth.org/Pages/hull_atlas.htm More information: www.jsnaonline.org and www.hullpublichealth.org<br />

10.9.3.11 Programme Budgeting and Outcomes<br />

As illustrated in Figure 1, expenditure on problems of mental health disorders per head<br />

for 2008/2009 in Hull was £176.64 compared to £192.74 for the Industrial Hinterlands<br />

average, £192.14 for North East Lincolnshire and £191.21 for England. Therefore,<br />

expenditure in Hull was considerably lower than England (ranked 94 th out of 152 PCTs)<br />

and other comparators.<br />

Expenditure per head for 2008/2009 in Hull on substance misuse was £19.58 (ranked<br />

57 th ) compared to £23.25 for the Industrial Hinterlands average, £38.78 for North East<br />

Lincolnshire and £17.81 for England. For organic mental disorders, the expenditures<br />

per head were £2.14, £15.02, £4.40 and £17.39 for Hull, Industrial Hinterlands, North<br />

East Lincolnshire and England respectively with Hull ranked 142 nd . For psychotic<br />

disorders, the expenditures per head were £9.29, £28.90, £71.57 and £33.69 for Hull,<br />

Industrial Hinterlands, North East Lincolnshire and England respectively with Hull ranked<br />

100 th . For child and adolescent mental health disorders, the expenditures per head<br />

were £13.20, £11.86, £9.37 and £13.33 for Hull, Industrial Hinterlands, North East<br />

Lincolnshire and England respectively with Hull ranked 72 nd .<br />

Information on two mental health disorder outcomes are also available within the<br />

information produced by the Yorkshire and Humber Public Health Observatory (Y&H<br />

PHO) programme budgeting tool for each PCT and England (but not for Industrial<br />

Hinterlands). The outcomes measures are given in Table 332 for Hull and comparator<br />

areas (see section 3.3.3 on page 44 for more on comparators). The percentage of<br />

patients on the enhanced Care Programme Approach (CPA) receiving face-to-face or<br />

telephone follow-up within seven days of discharge during 2007/2008 was lower than<br />

the Industrial Hinterlands and England. Hull has a higher directly standardised mortality<br />

rate (DSR per 100,000 European Standard Population) from suicide and undetermined<br />

injury compared to the Industrial Hinterlands and England (ranked 135 th out of 152<br />

PCTs).<br />

So overall, mental health outcomes were worse for Hull compared to England and<br />

comparators, and spend for 2008/2009 was considerably lower in Hull compared to<br />

England and comparator areas.<br />

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Foundation Profile – Hull Health Profile: Release 3. March 2011. 692

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!