18.12.2012 Views

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Interative Hull Atlas: www.hullpublichealth.org/Pages/hull_atlas.htm More information: www.jsnaonline.org and www.hullpublichealth.org<br />

Table 73 gives the life expectancy at birth for males and females for the period 2007-<br />

2009 for each Area and Locality. As these represent larger geographical areas relative<br />

to wards, there is less variability associated with the estimates and narrower confidence<br />

intervals (compared to those in Figure 48 and Figure 49). For both men and women,<br />

Riverside Area had the lowest life expectancy, and West Area had the highest life<br />

expectancy. The largest difference in life expectancy between the Areas was<br />

approximately 4.3 and 4.5 years for men and women respectively. There were few<br />

differences in life expectancy between Localities.<br />

Table 73: Life expectancy at birth for 2007-2009 by Area and Locality<br />

Area/Locality Life expectancy at birth (in years) for 2007-09, 95% CIs<br />

Males Females<br />

North Carr 74.5 (73.2, 75.9) 79.8 (78.7, 81.0)<br />

Northern 76.7 (75.3, 78.0) 81.4 (80.2, 82.7)<br />

Locality: North 75.8 (74.8, 76.7) 80.5 (79.7, 81.4)<br />

East 76.0 (75.0, 77.0) 79.7 (78.6, 80.8)<br />

Park 75.6 (74.5, 76.6) 79.8 (78.9, 80.8)<br />

Locality: East 75.6 (75.0, 76.3) 80.1 (79.4, 80.7)<br />

Riverside* 72.6 (71.6, 73.6) 77.8 (76.7, 78.8)<br />

West 76.9 (75.6, 78.2) 82.3 (81.1, 83.5)<br />

Wyke 76.8 (75.6, 78.0) 81.4 (80.2, 82.5)<br />

Locality: West 75.1 (74.4, 75.8) 79.9 (79.2, 80.6)<br />

HULL 75.4 (75.0, 75.8) 80.1 (79.7, 80.5)<br />

*Riverside not split into “East” and “West” for this table so it includes Drypool ward which<br />

is in East Locality.<br />

7.7.3 Relationship Between Deprivation and Life Expectancy at Birth<br />

It is apparent when comparing the life expectancy estimates in Figure 48 and Figure 49<br />

with deprivation illustrated in Figure 29 and Table 48 that there is a strong association<br />

locally between deprivation and life expectancy at birth. However, to illustrate the strong<br />

association at a national level, Figure 50 and Figure 51 show the IMD 2007 score and<br />

life expectancy at birth for 2006-2008 (see section 6.9 on page 131 for more on the<br />

IMD and section 12.10 on page 780 for more information on life expectancy) for 315 of<br />

the local authorities for England 24 for males and females respectively. The association<br />

is stronger for males than it is for females. In Hull, it can be seen that males and<br />

females have a lower life expectancy compared to the „predicted‟ life expectancy based<br />

on deprivation (plotted linear regression line). The underlying data are given in the<br />

APPENDIX on page 840.<br />

24 Life expectancy is available for 324 of the 326 local authorities (two local authorities have too smaller<br />

populations for reliable estimates to be produced). The IMD 2007 has not been updated following<br />

boundary changes in April 2009 as a result it is not available for all 326 of the current local authorities. As<br />

a result, the figure illustrates deprivation and life expectancy in 315 of the 326 local authorities.<br />

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Foundation Profile – Hull Health Profile: Release 3. March 2011. 185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!