18.12.2012 Views

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Interative Hull Atlas: www.hullpublichealth.org/Pages/hull_atlas.htm More information: www.jsnaonline.org and www.hullpublichealth.org<br />

10.5.1.5 Programme Budgeting and Outcomes<br />

As illustrated in Figure 1, expenditure on problems of the respiratory system per head<br />

for 2008/2009 in Hull was £114.50 compared to £92.71 for the Industrial Hinterlands<br />

average, £95.47 for North East Lincolnshire and £77.97 for England. Hull‟s expenditure<br />

on respiratory disease was the 2 nd highest of all 152 PCTs.<br />

Expenditure per head for 2008/2009 in Hull on obstructive airways disease was £36.98<br />

(ranked 1 st ) compared to £18.76 for the Industrial Hinterlands average, £17.44 for North<br />

East Lincolnshire and £12.70 for England. For asthma, the expenditures per head were<br />

£19.12, £20.18, £18.14 and £16.99 for Hull, Industrial Hinterlands, North East<br />

Lincolnshire and England respectively with Hull ranked 36 th .<br />

Information on three respiratory disease outcomes are also available within the<br />

information produced by the Yorkshire and Humber Public Health Observatory (Y&H<br />

PHO) programme budgeting tool for each PCT and England (but not for Industrial<br />

Hinterlands). The outcomes measures are given in Table 292 for Hull and comparator<br />

areas (see section 3.3.3 on page 44 for more on comparators). The under 75 directly<br />

standardised mortality rate (DSR per 100,000 European Standard Population) for<br />

bronchitis, emphysema and COPD combined, for bronchitis and emphysema, and for<br />

asthma are all higher in Hull compared to the Industrial Hinterlands and England.<br />

So overall, respiratory disease outcomes were worse for Hull compared to England,<br />

although not substantially different from other comparators. However, spend was<br />

considerably higher in Hull with the total expenditure on respiratory disease being the<br />

2 nd highest of all 152 PCTs. Given the high prevalence of smoking, the higher mortality<br />

rates in relation to England are not surprising.<br />

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Foundation Profile – Hull Health Profile: Release 3. March 2011. 605

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!