18.12.2012 Views

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Interative Hull Atlas: www.hullpublichealth.org/Pages/hull_atlas.htm More information: www.jsnaonline.org and www.hullpublichealth.org<br />

Table 201 gives under 75 SMRs for mortality from CHD for Hull and comparators for<br />

2006-2008. Hull‟s mortality rate is 39% and 67% higher than England for males and<br />

females respectively. For Hull men and women, the mortality rate was higher than the<br />

Industrial Hinterlands and the average of the 10 comparators, particularly for women.<br />

However, for Hull women, the mortality rate was higher than the Industrial Hinterlands<br />

group and the average of the 10 comparators. Of the comparator areas, only Leicester<br />

had a mortality rate higher than Hull for women. So whilst it can be seen from Table<br />

198, Table 199 and Table 200, the age-specific and overall mortality rates for women<br />

are considerably lower than men, when compared to England, women in Hull fare worse<br />

than men in Hull.<br />

Table 201: Under 75 standardised mortality ratios for CHD disease for Hull and<br />

comparators, 2006-2008<br />

Area Under 75 CHD SMR 2006-2008 (95% CI)<br />

Males Females Persons<br />

England 100 (99, 101) 100 (99, 101) 100 (99, 101)<br />

Hull 139 (125, 155) 167 (140, 198) 146 (133, 160)<br />

Y&H SHA 115 (112, 118) 117 (112, 122) 116 (113, 118)<br />

Indust Hinterlands 124 (121, 128) 142 (136, 149) 129 (126, 132)<br />

Wolverhampton 116 (103, 131) 109 (88, 134) 114 (103, 127)<br />

Salford 144 (128, 161) 160 (133, 192) 148 (134, 163)<br />

Derby 118 (105, 133) 124 (101, 152) 120 (108, 133)<br />

Stoke-on-Trent 121 (108, 136) 126 (103, 152) 122 (111, 135)<br />

Coventry 115 (103, 129) 103 (84, 125) 112 (102, 123)<br />

Plymouth 121 (107, 135) 103 (83, 127) 116 (105, 128)<br />

Sandwell 161 (146, 176) 167 (143, 194) 162 (150, 176)<br />

Middlesbrough 133 (114, 155) 147 (114, 186) 137 (120, 155)<br />

Sunderland 114 (102, 127) 149 (126, 174) 123 (113, 134)<br />

Leicester 162 (146, 180) 183 (155, 216) 168 (154, 183)<br />

Average above 10 130 (126, 135) 136 (129, 145) 132 (128, 136)<br />

NE Lincolnshire 135 (119, 154) 114 (89, 145) 130 (116, 146)<br />

The trends in the under 75 SMRs at ward, Area and Locality level are available for 1999-<br />

2001 to 2006-2008 for CHD on the Hull Atlas (www.hullpublichealth.org).<br />

The trends in the directly standardised mortality rates (DSRs) for CHD per 100,000<br />

persons for Hull and comparator areas is given in Figure 186. This figure refers to<br />

deaths for all ages as the World Class Commissioning target relates to all ages (see<br />

section 10.1.2.10 on page 464). It can be seen that for 1993-1995, the DSR per<br />

100,000 persons for Hull was similar but slightly lower than the comparator areas<br />

(Industrial Hinterlands, North East Lincolnshire and the average of the 10 comparator<br />

areas). However, for 2006-2008, Hull‟s DSR was similar but slightly higher than these<br />

comparator areas. The absolute gap between Hull and England has remained relatively<br />

constant over this period. The underlying data are given in the APPENDIX on page<br />

904.<br />

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Foundation Profile – Hull Health Profile: Release 3. March 2011. 457

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!