18.12.2012 Views

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Interative Hull Atlas: www.hullpublichealth.org/Pages/hull_atlas.htm More information: www.jsnaonline.org and www.hullpublichealth.org<br />

It is useful to summarise this information as the number of men with zero, one, two,<br />

three, four and five risk factors (Figure 150). Younger men tend to have a slightly<br />

higher percentage with more risk factors, but there is not a large difference among the<br />

age groups with the exception of men aged 75+ years who tend to have fewer risk<br />

factors. Overall, 1.5% of men had five of the risk factors, 13.1% had four, 30.9% had<br />

three, 34.6% had two, 15.9% had one and 4.1% had none of the five risk factors. The<br />

underlying data are given in the APPENDIX on page 887.<br />

Number of risk factors out of five (%)<br />

Figure 150: Percentage of men by number of five risk factors, Hull 2007<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

18-24 25-44 45-64 65-74 75+<br />

Age of man<br />

Five Four Three Two One Zero<br />

Table 161 and Figure 151 gives the equivalent information for women. Examining the<br />

first and last rows, it can be seen that 67 (4.3%) women had none of the risk factors and<br />

10 (0.6%) women had all five of the risk factors. Women tend to have less multiple risk<br />

factors compared to men with a similar pattern across the age groups, i.e. similar<br />

proportions of women with multiple risk factors across the age groups for those aged<br />

under 75 years with women aged 75+ years having fewer multiple risk factors. It should<br />

be noted that information is available on all five risk factors for only 75% of women<br />

(1,573 out of the 2,092 women participating in the survey). It is not known whether this<br />

biases the information presented or not. It is possible that women who do not have the<br />

risk factor did not answer the question as they felt it was irrelevant to them in which case<br />

the prevalence of multiple risk factors would be over-estimated in the information<br />

presented below. However, it is also possible that women were more aware of these<br />

risk factors and were more reluctant to report that they smoked, drank too much alcohol,<br />

weighed too much, etc. If women did not answer the questions because they had these<br />

risk factors but were reluctant to complete the information on the questionnaire, then the<br />

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Foundation Profile – Hull Health Profile: Release 3. March 2011. 378

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!