18.12.2012 Views

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Interative Hull Atlas: www.hullpublichealth.org/Pages/hull_atlas.htm More information: www.jsnaonline.org and www.hullpublichealth.org<br />

10.9.3.6 General Practitioner Consultations for Mental Health<br />

This section uses information given within the Mental Health Equity Audit (for full report<br />

see www.hullpublichealth.org). Whilst the information could have been updated for<br />

more recent population estimates, the majority of the prevalence estimates are national<br />

surveys have not been updated, so this will make relatively little difference to the<br />

estimates of the number of people within Hull with different mental illnesses.<br />

The fourth national study carried out by the Royal College of General Practitioners, the<br />

Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, and the Department of Health examined<br />

morbidity statistics in General Practice (McCormick, Fleming et al. 1995). This survey<br />

was conducted during 1991-1992 and provides the most up-to-date reasons why people<br />

consult their GP. The survey found that over 7% of people consulted for a mental illness<br />

which was 649 per 10,000 people. The prevalence was lowest among older children<br />

and increased with age. Among every age group in adults, the rate was higher for<br />

women than men. It is not stated specifically what conditions are classified as mental<br />

illness. However, from the tables and appendices it appears that mental illness was<br />

classified as organic psychotic conditions (ICD 9: 290-294), other psychoses (295-299),<br />

neurotic disorders, personality disorders and other non-psychotic mental disorders (300-<br />

316) and mental retardation (317-319). However, an acute reaction to stress or an<br />

adjustment reaction may be recorded by another doctor as a neurotic disorder or<br />

depression. Depression not elsewhere classified had a prevalence rate of 110 per<br />

10,000 persons, and special syndromes or syndromes not elsewhere classified a rate of<br />

97 per 10,000 persons. These were mainly disorders of sleep, and pains of mental<br />

origin (psychalgia). In addition, 26 per 10,000 consulted for acute reaction to stress, and<br />

36 for adjustment reaction. It is not entirely clear if these are classifications are included<br />

in the mental illness definition or whether they are additional conditions. However, it<br />

appears they are additional and the total consultation rate would increase from 649 to<br />

908 per 100,000 (40% increase). This would increase the consultation rate from 7% to<br />

9.8%. However, this is considerably lower than the 25% figure quoted by others for<br />

consultations related to mental health problems (Goldberg and Bridges 1987). It is likely<br />

that this is due to differing definitions and that reports indicate that only about 30% to<br />

50% of depression in primary care is recognised by GPs (Goldberg and Bridges 1987;<br />

Doherty 1997; Vazquez-Barquero and al 1997; Dixon, Raymond et al. 2006).<br />

Based on the prevalence calculated from the number of consultations from the 1991-<br />

1992 Survey, the estimated number of people in different geographical areas can be<br />

estimated in Hull (using resident population estimates for October 2005 64 ) assuming that<br />

the prevalence estimated above applies to the area for the current year. This<br />

assumption may be incorrect as there might have been an increase in the prevalence for<br />

various reasons, more people may be willing to see their GP about such problems as<br />

acceptance and attitudes towards mental illness may have changed over time, the<br />

64 It would be possible to update this using a more recent population file, but with the potential problems<br />

with the prevalence estimates, the tables only provide a guide only, and for this reason, the population<br />

figures for October 2005 will be sufficient, i.e. the estimates should be treated with caution.<br />

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Foundation Profile – Hull Health Profile: Release 3. March 2011. 677

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!