joint strategic needs assessment foundation profile - JSNA

Interative Hull Atlas: www.hullpublichealth.org/Pages/hull_atlas.htm More information: www.jsnaonline.org and www.hullpublichealth.org
Table 179: Percentage of women participating in cervical cancer screening as at 31st
March 2010 for Hull and comparator areas
Area Cervical cancer screening for women aged 25-64 years
(attendance within last five years as at 31 st March 2010) by age
Population (000s) Screened (%)
25-49 50-64 25-64 25-49 50-64 25-64
England 9,541.9 4,038.6 13,580.5 74.0 78.9 78.9
Y&H SHA 897.1 402.5 1,299.6 76.0 79.9 80.2
Hull 47.7 21.0 68.7 75.0 77.9 79.2
Middlesbrough 24.6 11.1 35.7 69.2 73.4 74.1
Sunderland 46.5 23.5 69.9 77.8 79.5 80.9
Salford 41.9 15.7 57.6 72.4 76.8 77.4
Derby City 51.7 20.2 71.9 76.1 81.9 81.0
Leicester City 61.9 21.6 83.5 70.0 78.9 76.3
Sandwell 58.9 22.7 81.6 72.8 77.0 77.5
Coventry 59.6 22.5 82.1 71.3 77.5 76.6
Stoke-on-Trent 45.4 19.9 65.4 74.8 78.1 79.1
Wolverhampton 43.5 17.7 61.2 72.0 76.9 76.9
Plymouth 44.8 19.2 64.0 74.7 80.1 79.9
Average 10 above 478.7 194.1 672.8 73.2 78.3 78.1
NE Lincs 26.5 12.6 39.1 78.2 80.0 81.6
Information is available at General Practitioner level from the Primary Care Information
System (Open Exeter) for the financial year 2009/2010 as well as providing the
information for Hull overall and England. Figure 174, Figure 175 and Figure 176 give
the cervical cancer screening rates for the practices in North, East and West Localities
respectively. The underlying data for the figures is available in the APPENDIX on page
899.
To the 31 st March 2010 in Hull, 54,375 women were screened overall out of 68,678
(79.2%), with a comparable but very slightly lower figure in England (10,711,679 women
screened out of 13,580,499; 78.9%) 55 . However, there was considerable variability in
the screening rates in Hull among the practices which ranged from 52% to 91%. In
general, the lowest screening rates were observed for practices within West Locality.
55 The rates from the PCIS differ slightly from those from the Information Centre. It is possible that those
from the Information Centre include updated information as the percentages are slightly higher.
Nevertheless, the pattern in screening appears similar with Hull having a similar rate (marginally higher
compared to England, and that the percentage screened is lower than the target of 80%.
Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Foundation Profile – Hull Health Profile: Release 3. March 2011. 422