05.06.2013 Views

RIVISTA DI DIRITTO TRIBUTARIO INTERNAZIONALE - Rdti.it

RIVISTA DI DIRITTO TRIBUTARIO INTERNAZIONALE - Rdti.it

RIVISTA DI DIRITTO TRIBUTARIO INTERNAZIONALE - Rdti.it

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A. S. Bergantino: Tonnage tax: the Italian proposal and the European experiences<br />

on the national register. even when such registration is not set down as<br />

qualifying cond<strong>it</strong>ion.<br />

c) The traffie adm<strong>it</strong>ted<br />

In generaI. in the various European countries, no express distinction<br />

is made, for the purposes of adm<strong>it</strong>ting a vessel to the regime, between<br />

ships used in coastal navigation and ships used in intemational traffico<br />

This lack of provision is to be put down to the fact that in some cases <strong>it</strong><br />

would be extremely difficult to make such a distinction. However, the absence<br />

of any distinction allows operators who are "sheltered" from compet<strong>it</strong>ion<br />

by operators of third countries - in that the latter cannot freely<br />

access Commun<strong>it</strong>y coastal navigation trades -, to be adm<strong>it</strong>ted to the<br />

lump-sum regime. If the objective of the measure is for the national fleet<br />

to achieve a compet<strong>it</strong>ive edge over third countries' fleets, ships operating<br />

in cabotage traffic should not be adm<strong>it</strong>ted to the lump-sum regime. Ho\Vever,<br />

<strong>it</strong> should be a decision taken at Commun<strong>it</strong>y leve!.<br />

Since most of Europe has failed to exclude from tonnage tax ships<br />

used in coastal navigation, a similar decision on the part of Italy<br />

would be greatly damaging on account of the almost compi et ed liberalization<br />

for EU operators of coastal navigation among member<br />

countries.<br />

It might be appropriate then, to distinguish between European and<br />

national coastal navigation traffic (over medium to long distances), exposed<br />

to the compet<strong>it</strong>ion of other European countries, and 'Iocal' traffic<br />

(links w<strong>it</strong>h minor islands), which in this respect, is for the most part stili<br />

protected (27). The inherent difficulties in differentiating between ships<br />

used in the t\Vo types of traffic could in part be solved by referring to a<br />

size lim<strong>it</strong>o<br />

d) Lim<strong>it</strong>s based on eompanies' legai form<br />

The Un<strong>it</strong>ed Kingdom, pursuing the twofold objective of establishing<br />

a stringent ring fencing and of attracting a greater number of vessels,<br />

introduced the obligation of 'group acces": ali the companies belonging<br />

to the same group are to opt for the regime, ali in ali aut. The latter,<br />

however, is the most controversial aspect of the Br<strong>it</strong>ish legislation<br />

and the mai n obstacle in the way of the measure achieving greater su c-<br />

(27) A differentiated system is in force in Greece. The lump-sum taxation regime<br />

applies also to ships that only calI at national ports; the tax to be paid by these ships,<br />

however, is obtained through the use of different coefficients and the final ouday is<br />

calculated in the Iocal currency (whereas ordinary tonnage tax is calculated in dol­<br />

Iars), see footnote 28.<br />

<strong>RIVISTA</strong> <strong>DI</strong> <strong>DI</strong>RmO TRIBL"TARlO <strong>INTERNAZIONALE</strong> 312001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!