Theism and Explanation - Appeared-to-Blogly

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bibliography Allen, Rhianon and Arthur S. Reber. “Unconscious Intelligence.” In A Companion to Cognitive Science, edited by William Bechtel and George Graham, 314–23. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy, vol. 13. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. Alston, William P. Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991. . “Speaking Literally of God” [1981]. In Philosophy of Religion: Selected Readings, edited by Michael Peterson, William Hasker, Bruce Reichenbach, David Basinger, 365–86. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. Amar, Shlomo. “G–d is Angry.” Published in the on-line Arutz Sheva, http://israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=74503, 31 December 2004. Aquinas, Thomas. Selected Philosophical Writings, edited by Timothy McDermott. The World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. . Summa Contra Gentiles. Turin: Marietti, 1914. . Summa Theologiae [Summa Theologica]. Turin: Marietti, 1915. Astin, John A., Elaine Harkness, Edzard Ernst. “The Effi cacy of ‘Distant Healing’: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.” Annals of Internal Medicine 132 (2000): 903–10. Atran, Scott. In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. Evolution and Cognition. Oxford University Press, 2002. Audi, Robert. Practical Reasoning. The Problems of Philosophy: Their Past and Present. London: Routledge, 1989. Ayer, A. J. The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge. London: Macmillan, 1940. . Language, Truth and Logic [1936]. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971. Baillie, James. “Review of Rethinking Commonsense Psychology by Matthew Ratcliffe.” Philosophical Books 49:2 (April 2008): 172–75. Banner, Michael C. The Justifi cation of Science and the Rationality of Religious Belief. Oxford Philosophical Monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990. Barrett, Justin L. and Frank C. Keil. “Conceptualizing a Nonnatural Entity: Anthropomorphism in God Concepts.” Cognitive Psychology 31 (1996): 219–47. Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics, vol. 1, part 2: The Doctrine of the Word of God. Translated by G. T. Thomson and Harold Knight. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1956. Bartholomew, Michael. “Lyell and Evolution: An Account of Lyell’s Response to the Prospect of an Evolutionary Ancestry for Man.” The British Journal for the History of Science 6 (1972–73): 261–303. Bartley, William Warren. The Retreat to Commitment. 2nd edition. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1984. Beaudoin, John. “On Some Criticisms of Hume’s Principle of Proportioning Cause to Effect.” Philo 2 (1999): 26–40.
192 Bibliography Behe, Michael J. Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: Free Press, 1996. Bennett, Jonathan. “The Conscience of Huckleberry Finn.” Philosophy 49 (1974): 123–34. Benson, Herbert, Jeffery A. Dusek, Jane B. Sherwood, et al. “Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer in Cardiac Bypass Patients: a Multicenter Randomized Trial of Uncertainty and Certainty of Receiving Intercessory Prayer.” American Heart Journal 151 (2005): 934–42. Berger, Peter L. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion [1967]. Anchor Books. New York: Doubleday, 1969. Bezuidenhout, Anne. “An Essay on Belief and Acceptance.” The Review of Metaphysics 50 (1996): 392–95. Bishop, John. Believing by Faith: An Essay in the Ethics and Epistemology of Religious Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. . Natural Agency: An Essay on the Causal Theory of Action. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. Boyd, Richard N. “Kinds, Complexity and Multiple Realization: Comments on Millikan’s ‘Historical Kinds and the Special Sciences.’” Philosophical Studies 95 (1999): 67–98. Boyer, Pascal. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994. Bratman, Michael E. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason [1987]. The David Hume Series of Philosophy and Cognitive Science Reissues. Palo Alto, CA: CSLI Publications, 1999. Brauer Matthew J., Barbara Forrest, and Steven G. Gey, “Is it Science Yet? Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution” Washington University Law Quarterly 83 (2005): 1–149. Brooke, John Hedley. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge History of Science Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. Brown, Kevin. “Gerber’s Gravity,” http://www.mathpages.com/home/k-math527/ kmath527.htm, 26 October, 2006. Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Translated by Ford Lewis Battles. Library of Christian Classics, vols. xx and xxi. London: SCM, 1961. Carrier, R. C. “The Argument from Biogenesis: Probabilities Against a Natural Origin of Life.” Biology and Philosophy vol. xix (2004): 739–64. Carroll, Joseph. “Introduction.” In On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection by Charles Darwin, 9–72. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2003. Chalmers, A. F. What is This Thing Called Science? An Assessment of the Nature and Status of Science and Its Methods. 2nd edition. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1982. Churchland, Paul M. Matter and Consciousness: A Contemporary Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. A Bradford Book. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984. Cioffi , Frank. “Freud and the Idea of a Pseudo-Science.” In Explanation in the Behavioural Sciences, edited by Robert Borger and Frank Cioffi , 471–515. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Clayton, Philip. Explanation from Physics to Theology: An Essay in Rationality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989. Cohen, Cynthia B., Sondra E. Wheeler, David A. Scott, et al., “Prayer as Therapy.” The Hastings Center Report 30 (May 2000): 40–43. Cohen, I. Bernard. “An Interview with Einstein.” Scientifi c American 193:1 (July 1955): 68–73. Cohen, L. Jonathan. “Belief and Acceptance.” Mind 98 (July 1989): 367–89. . An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.
Page 2 and 3:
Theism and Explanation
Page 4 and 5:
Theism and Explanation Gregory W. D
Page 6:
To Anna who never tires of asking
Page 10:
Acknowledgements My thanks are due
Page 13 and 14:
2 Theism and Explanation Could it m
Page 15 and 16:
4 Theism and Explanation While I ho
Page 17 and 18:
6 Theism and Explanation experiment
Page 19 and 20:
8 Theism and Explanation Plantinga
Page 21 and 22:
10 Theism and Explanation explanati
Page 23 and 24:
12 Theism and Explanation by refere
Page 25 and 26:
14 Theism and Explanation explanati
Page 27 and 28:
16 Theism and Explanation God creat
Page 30 and 31:
2 On Explanations in General “Exp
Page 32 and 33:
On Explanations in General 21 of ou
Page 34 and 35:
On Explanations in General 23 merel
Page 36 and 37:
Figure 2.2 Swinburne’s conception
Page 38 and 39:
On Explanations in General 27 simil
Page 40 and 41:
On Explanations in General 29 condi
Page 42 and 43:
On Explanations in General 31 could
Page 44 and 45:
3 What are Theistic Explanations? I
Page 46 and 47:
What are Theistic Explanations? 35
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
3.2.2 Positing a Divine Agent What
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
4 What Would They Explain? It’s a
Page 72 and 73:
4.2 SINGULAR AND GENERAL EXPLANATIO
Page 74 and 75:
What Would They Explain? 63 shelter
Page 76 and 77:
What Would They Explain? 65 were we
Page 78 and 79:
What Would They Explain? 67 not des
Page 80 and 81:
What Would They Explain? 69 must of
Page 82 and 83:
What Would They Explain? 71 to prod
Page 84 and 85:
What Would They Explain? 73 There i
Page 86:
What Would They Explain? 75 how mig
Page 89 and 90:
78 Theism and Explanation contradic
Page 91 and 92:
80 Theism and Explanation low—tha
Page 93 and 94:
82 Theism and Explanation 5.1.3 Is
Page 95 and 96:
84 Theism and Explanation eye. But
Page 97 and 98:
86 Theism and Explanation If we acc
Page 99 and 100:
88 Theism and Explanation Why not,
Page 101 and 102:
90 Theism and Explanation directly,
Page 103 and 104:
92 Theism and Explanation of divers
Page 105 and 106:
94 Theism and Explanation there can
Page 107 and 108:
96 Theism and Explanation already c
Page 109 and 110:
98 Theism and Explanation (2.1.2) t
Page 112 and 113:
6 Inference to the Best Explanation
Page 114 and 115:
Inference to the Best Explanation 1
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
7 Successful Theistic Explanations
Page 128 and 129:
Successful Theistic Explanations 11
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151: Successful Theistic Explanations 13
Page 152 and 153: Successful Theistic Explanations 14
Page 154 and 155: 8 Conclusion Miss Binney spoke as i
Page 156 and 157: Conclusion 145 explanation that met
Page 158 and 159: Appendix Intentional Explanations M
Page 160 and 161: Appendix 149 attend any discussion
Page 162 and 163: Appendix 151 explanation is a causa
Page 164 and 165: Appendix 153 we assume is a “myth
Page 166 and 167: Appendix 155 Will this suffi ce as
Page 168 and 169: Appendix 157 reasoning, Schueler su
Page 170 and 171: Appendix 159 action, one that has a
Page 172 and 173: Appendix 161 estimate of her charac
Page 174 and 175: Appendix 163 causal laws do exist.
Page 176 and 177: Appendix 165 this is the explanatio
Page 178 and 179: Notes NOTES TO CHAPTER 1 1. Numbers
Page 180 and 181: Notes 169 James Maclaurin has remin
Page 182 and 183: Notes 171 19. Musgrave, “Scientif
Page 184 and 185: Notes 173 the most explicit in its
Page 186 and 187: Notes 175 any true proposition, the
Page 188 and 189: Notes 177 weaker but to their mind
Page 190 and 191: Notes 179 15. Hume, “Dialogues,
Page 192 and 193: Notes 181 19. Swinburne, Is There a
Page 194 and 195: Notes 183 it will also confi rm H 2
Page 196 and 197: Notes 185 91. I am grateful to Geor
Page 198 and 199: Notes 187 this be a fatal objection
Page 200: Notes 189 71. Lakatos, “Falsifi c
Page 205 and 206: 194 Bibliography Dembski, William A
Page 207 and 208: 196 Bibliography . A Treatise of Hu
Page 209 and 210: 198 Bibliography Melnyk, Andrew. A
Page 211 and 212: 200 Bibliography Rundle, Bede. 2004
Page 214 and 215: Index A abduction: and induction, 1
Page 216 and 217: defences, and theodicies, 134-35 de
Page 218 and 219: intelligent design theory: argument
Page 220 and 221: preemption, causal. See causal pree
Page 222: tsunami, Boxing Day, 60, 61, 68, 14
show all

Theism and Explanation - Appeared-to-Blogly

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?