Theism and Explanation - Appeared-to-Blogly

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bibliography 197 Le Poidevin, Robin. Arguing for Atheism: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. London: Routledge, 1996. Lewis, David. “Causation” [1973]. In Philosophical Papers vol. ii, 159–213. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. Lewontin, Richard C. “Billions and Billions of Demons.” The New York Review of Books 44:1 (January 9, 1997): 24–33. Lipton, Peter. Inference to the Best Explanation Philosophical Issues in Science. London: Routledge, 1991. Lycan, William G. “Explanation and Epistemology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, edited by Paul K. Moser, 408–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. . Judgement and Justifi cation. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. Lyell, Charles. Life, Letters, and Journals of Sir Charles Lyell, Bart, edited by Katharine M. Lyell. London: John Murray, 1881. . Principles of Geology. 3 vols. [1st edition 1830]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990. Mach, Ernst. The Principles of Physical Optics: An Historical and Philosophical Treatment [1921]. Translated by John S. Anderson and A. F. A. Young [1926]. New York: Dover Publications, 1953. Mackie, J. L. The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974. . “Evil and Omnipotence.” Mind 64 (1955): 200–12. . The Miracle of Theism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982. Maher, Patrick. “Confi rmation Theory.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2nd edition. Edited by Donald M. Borchert. MacMillan Reference Books. Woodbridge, CT: Macmillan, 2005. patrick.maher1.net/ctk.pdf, 24 May 2006. Malebranche, Nicolas. The Search After Truth, edited by Thomas M. Lennon and Paul J. Olscamp. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Malle, B. F. “Folk Explanations of Intentional Action.” In Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition, edited by B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, and D. A. Baldwin, 265–86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001. Martin, Michael. Atheism: A Philosophical Justifi cation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992. Mascall, E. L. Existence and Analogy [1949]. London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1966. Maxwell, Grover. “The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities.” In Scientifi c Explanation, Space, and Time, edited by Herbert Feigl and Grover Maxwell, 3–27. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. iii. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1962. McCalla, Arthur. The Creationist Debate: The Encounter between the Bible and the Historical Mind. London: Continuum, 2006. McCann, Hugh J. and Jonathan L Kvanvig. “The Occasionalist Proselytizer: A Modifi ed Catechism.” In Philosophical Perspectives V: Philosophy of Religion, edited by James E. Tomberlin, 587–615. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing, 1991. McCausland, Ian. “Anomalies in the History of Relativity.” Journal of Scientifi c Exploration 13 (1999): 271–90. McGrew, Timothy. “Review of Richard Swinburne, Epistemic Justifi cation” [2002]. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. http://ndpr.nd.edu/re-view.cfm?id=1094 McMullin, Ernan. “Structural Explanation.” American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1978): 139–47. Mele, Alfred R. Motivation and Agency. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
198 Bibliography Melnyk, Andrew. A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern Materialism. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Meyer, Stephen C. “The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories.” Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 117 (2004): 213–39. . “The Return of the God Hypothesis.” Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 11 (1999): 1–38. Mill, John Stuart. “A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive” [1843]. In Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vols. vii–viii, edited by J. M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1973–74. . “Three Essays on Religion” [1874]. In Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. x, edited by J. M. Robson, 369–489. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969. Montero, Barbara. “Physicalism in An Infi nitely Decomposable World.” Erkenntnis 64 (2006): 177–91. Morris, Thomas V. “Perfection and Creation.” In Reasoned Faith: Essays in Philosophical Theology in Honor of Norman Kretzmann, edited by Eleonore Stump, 234–47. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993. Moser, Paul K. Philosophy After Objectivity: Making Sense in Perspective [1993]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Musgrave, Alan. “Deductivism.” Unpublished paper, Computer and Information Science Seminar, University of Otago, 2007. . Essays on Realism and Rationality. Studies in the Philosophy of Karl R. Popper and Critical Rationalism 12. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi, 1999. . “Evidential Support, Falsifi cation, Heuristics, and Anarchism.” In Progress and Rationality in Science, edited by Gerard Radnitzky and Gunnar Andersson, 181–201. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 58 / Synthese Library 125. Dordrecht: D. Seidel, 1978. . “Kuhn’s Second Thoughts.” British Journal of Philosophy and Science 22 (1971): 287–306. . “Responses.” In Rationality and Reality: Conversations with Alan Musgrave, edited by Colin Cheyne and John Worrall, 293–333. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. xx. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006. . “Scientifi c Realism and the Miracle Argument.” Unpublished paper, Philosophy Seminar, University of Otago, 2005. Nadler, Steven. “Malebranche on Causation.” In The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche, edited by Steven Nadler, 112–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Nagel, Ernest. “Naturalism Reconsidered.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 28 (1954–55): 5–17. Nagel, Thomas. The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. National Academy of Sciences. Science and Creationism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999. Nelson, Paul A. “The Role of Theology in Current Evolutionary Reasoning.” Biology and Philosophy 11 (1996): 493–517. Niiniluoto, Ilkka. “Truth-seeking by Abduction.” Induction and Deduction in the Sciences, edited by Friedrich Stadler, 57–82. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol. xi. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003. Notturno, M. A. and Paul R. McHugh. “Is Freudian Psychoanalytic Theory Really Falsifi able?” Metaphilosophy 18 (1987): 306–20. Numbers, Ronald L. “Science without God: Natural Laws and Christian Beliefs.” In When Science and Christianity Meet, edited by David C. Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers, 265–85. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
Page 2 and 3:
Theism and Explanation
Page 4 and 5:
Theism and Explanation Gregory W. D
Page 6:
To Anna who never tires of asking
Page 10:
Acknowledgements My thanks are due
Page 13 and 14:
2 Theism and Explanation Could it m
Page 15 and 16:
4 Theism and Explanation While I ho
Page 17 and 18:
6 Theism and Explanation experiment
Page 19 and 20:
8 Theism and Explanation Plantinga
Page 21 and 22:
10 Theism and Explanation explanati
Page 23 and 24:
12 Theism and Explanation by refere
Page 25 and 26:
14 Theism and Explanation explanati
Page 27 and 28:
16 Theism and Explanation God creat
Page 30 and 31:
2 On Explanations in General “Exp
Page 32 and 33:
On Explanations in General 21 of ou
Page 34 and 35:
On Explanations in General 23 merel
Page 36 and 37:
Figure 2.2 Swinburne’s conception
Page 38 and 39:
On Explanations in General 27 simil
Page 40 and 41:
On Explanations in General 29 condi
Page 42 and 43:
On Explanations in General 31 could
Page 44 and 45:
3 What are Theistic Explanations? I
Page 46 and 47:
What are Theistic Explanations? 35
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
3.2.2 Positing a Divine Agent What
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
4 What Would They Explain? It’s a
Page 72 and 73:
4.2 SINGULAR AND GENERAL EXPLANATIO
Page 74 and 75:
What Would They Explain? 63 shelter
Page 76 and 77:
What Would They Explain? 65 were we
Page 78 and 79:
What Would They Explain? 67 not des
Page 80 and 81:
What Would They Explain? 69 must of
Page 82 and 83:
What Would They Explain? 71 to prod
Page 84 and 85:
What Would They Explain? 73 There i
Page 86:
What Would They Explain? 75 how mig
Page 89 and 90:
78 Theism and Explanation contradic
Page 91 and 92:
80 Theism and Explanation low—tha
Page 93 and 94:
82 Theism and Explanation 5.1.3 Is
Page 95 and 96:
84 Theism and Explanation eye. But
Page 97 and 98:
86 Theism and Explanation If we acc
Page 99 and 100:
88 Theism and Explanation Why not,
Page 101 and 102:
90 Theism and Explanation directly,
Page 103 and 104:
92 Theism and Explanation of divers
Page 105 and 106:
94 Theism and Explanation there can
Page 107 and 108:
96 Theism and Explanation already c
Page 109 and 110:
98 Theism and Explanation (2.1.2) t
Page 112 and 113:
6 Inference to the Best Explanation
Page 114 and 115:
Inference to the Best Explanation 1
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
7 Successful Theistic Explanations
Page 128 and 129:
Successful Theistic Explanations 11
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
8 Conclusion Miss Binney spoke as i
Page 156 and 157:
Conclusion 145 explanation that met
Page 158 and 159: Appendix Intentional Explanations M
Page 160 and 161: Appendix 149 attend any discussion
Page 162 and 163: Appendix 151 explanation is a causa
Page 164 and 165: Appendix 153 we assume is a “myth
Page 166 and 167: Appendix 155 Will this suffi ce as
Page 168 and 169: Appendix 157 reasoning, Schueler su
Page 170 and 171: Appendix 159 action, one that has a
Page 172 and 173: Appendix 161 estimate of her charac
Page 174 and 175: Appendix 163 causal laws do exist.
Page 176 and 177: Appendix 165 this is the explanatio
Page 178 and 179: Notes NOTES TO CHAPTER 1 1. Numbers
Page 180 and 181: Notes 169 James Maclaurin has remin
Page 182 and 183: Notes 171 19. Musgrave, “Scientif
Page 184 and 185: Notes 173 the most explicit in its
Page 186 and 187: Notes 175 any true proposition, the
Page 188 and 189: Notes 177 weaker but to their mind
Page 190 and 191: Notes 179 15. Hume, “Dialogues,
Page 192 and 193: Notes 181 19. Swinburne, Is There a
Page 194 and 195: Notes 183 it will also confi rm H 2
Page 196 and 197: Notes 185 91. I am grateful to Geor
Page 198 and 199: Notes 187 this be a fatal objection
Page 200: Notes 189 71. Lakatos, “Falsifi c
Page 203 and 204: 192 Bibliography Behe, Michael J. D
Page 205 and 206: 194 Bibliography Dembski, William A
Page 207: 196 Bibliography . A Treatise of Hu
Page 211 and 212: 200 Bibliography Rundle, Bede. 2004
Page 214 and 215: Index A abduction: and induction, 1
Page 216 and 217: defences, and theodicies, 134-35 de
Page 218 and 219: intelligent design theory: argument
Page 220 and 221: preemption, causal. See causal pree
Page 222: tsunami, Boxing Day, 60, 61, 68, 14
show all

Theism and Explanation - Appeared-to-Blogly

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?