Theism and Explanation - Appeared-to-Blogly

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bibliography 195 Garcia, Laura L. “Divine Freedom and Creation.” The Philosophical Quarterly 42 (1992): 191–213. Gillespie, Neal C. Charles Darwin and the Problem of Creation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979. Ginet, Carl. “In Defense of a Non-Causal Account of Reasons Explanations” Journal of Ethics 12 (2008): 229–37. . On Action. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Gishlick, Alan, Nick Matze, and Wesley R. Elsberry. “Meyer’s Hopeless Monster.” 2004. http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2004/08/me-yers_hopeless_monster.html Grayling, A. C. “Bolus of Nonsense.” New Humanist Web Exclusive Articles, 2008. http://newhumanist.org.uk/1881 Gould, Stephen Jay. The Panda’s Thumb: More Refl ections on Natural History. New York: Norton, 1980. Griffi ths, Paul E. “Emotions as Natural and Normative Kinds.” Philosophy of Science 71 (2004): 901–11. Grünbaum, Adolf. “Creation as a Pseudo-Explanation in Current Physical Cosmology” Erkenntnis 35 (1991): 233–54. . “Popper vs Inductivism.” In Progress and Rationality in Science, edited by Gerard Radnitzky and Gunnar Andersson, 117–142. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 58 / Synthese Library 125. Dordrecht: D. Seidel, 1978. . “The Poverty of Theistic Cosmology.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2004): 561–614. Haack, Susan. “The Two Faces of Quine’s Naturalism.” Synthese 94 (1993): 335–56. Hales, Steven D. “Evidence and the Afterlife.” Philosophia 28 (2001): 335–46. Hardy, G. H. “The Indian Mathematician Ramanujan.” The American Mathematical Monthly 44 (1937): 137–55. Helm, Paul. Eternal God: A Study of God Without Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988. Hempel, Carl G. Aspects of Scientifi c Explanation. New York: Free Press, 1965. . “Logical Positivism and the Social Sciences.” In The Legacy of Logical Positivism: Studies in the Philosophy of Science, edited by Peter Achinstein and Stephen F. Barker, 163–94. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1969. . Philosophy of Natural Science. Foundations of Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966. Herschel, John Frederick William. A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy [1830]. The Sources of Science 17. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation, 1966. Himma, Kenneth Einar. “The application-conditions for design inferences: Why the design arguments need the help of other arguments for God’s existence.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (2005): 1–33. Hoffman, Joshua and Rosenkrantz, Gary S. The Divine Attributes. Exploring the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002. Horton, Robin. Patterns of Thought in Africa and the West: Essays on Magic, Religion and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Hughes, Gerard J. The Nature of God. The Problems of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1995. Hume, David. “Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion” [1779]. Principal Writings on Religion, edited by J. C. A. Gaskin, 29–130. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford University Press, 1993. . “An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding” [1777]. In Hume’s Enquiries, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 5–165. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1902.
196 Bibliography . A Treatise of Human Nature [1740], edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978. Hutto, Daniel D. “Davidson’s Identity Crisis.” Dialectica 52 (1998): 45–61. Huxley, Thomas Henry. “The Origin of Species” [1860]. In Lay Sermons, Addresses, and Reviews, 255–98. New Edition. London: Macmillan, 1883. Johnson, Phillip E. Reason in the Balance: The Case Against Naturalism in Science, Law, and Education. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1995. . “The Unravelling of Scientifi c Materialism.” First Things 77 (November 1997): 22–25. Jolley, Nicholas. “Introduction.” In Malebranche: Dialogues on Metaphysics and Religion, edited by Nicholas Jolley and David Scott, viii–xxiv. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Jones, John E. “Memorandum Opinion.” Kitzmiller et al. vs Dover Area School District. U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, 20 December 2005. http://www2.ncseweb.org/wp. Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Pure Reason [1787]. Translated by Norman Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan Press, 1929. Kanzian, Christian. “Naturalism, Physicalism, and Some Notes on ‘Analytical Philosophy.’” In Analytic Philosophy Without Naturalism, edited by Antonella Corradini, Sergio Galvan, and E. Jonathan Lowe, 89–93. Routledge Studies in Twentieth-Century Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2006. Kenny, Anthony. The God of the Philosophers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979. Kim, Jaegwon. “Events as Property Exemplifi cations.” In Action Theory: Proceedings of the Winnipeg Conference on Human Action, 9–11 May 1975, edited by Myles Brand and Douglas Walton, 159–77. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1976. . Philosophy of Mind. Dimensions of Philosophy. Boulder, CO: Westview [HarperCollins], 1996. Kitcher, Philip. Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996. . “Explanatory Unifi cation.” Philosophy of Science 48 (1981): 507–31. Knight, David. “The Context of Creationism in Darwin’s England.” In The Cultures of Creationism: Anti-Evolutionist in English-Speaking Countries, edited by Simon Coleman and Leslie Carlin, 29–43. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004. Lahav, Ran. “The Amazing Predictive Power of Folk Psychology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (1992): 99–105. Lakatos, Imre. “Falsifi cation and the Methodology of Scientifi c Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, 91–189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Laudan, Larry. “Commentary: Science at the Bar–Causes for Concern” Science, Technology, and Human Values, 7:41 (1982): 16–19. . “How About Bust? Factoring Explanatory Power Back into Theory Evaluation.” Philosophy of Science 64 (1997): 306–16. Laurentin, René and Henri Joyeux, Scientifi c and Medical Studies on the Apparitions at Medjugorje [1985]. Translated by Luke Griffi n. Dublin: Veritas, 1987. Lawson, E. Thomas and Robert N. McCauley. Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Leftow, Brian. Time and Eternity. Cornell Studies in the Philosophy of Religion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991. Lehrer, Keith. “Justifi cation, Explanation, and Induction.” In Induction, Acceptance, and Rational Belief, edited by Marshall Swain, 100–133. Synthese Library. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1970. Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. “The Principles of Philosophy, or, the Monadology” [1714]. In Philosophical Essays, edited and translated by Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber, 213–25. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1995.
Page 2 and 3:
Theism and Explanation
Page 4 and 5:
Theism and Explanation Gregory W. D
Page 6:
To Anna who never tires of asking
Page 10:
Acknowledgements My thanks are due
Page 13 and 14:
2 Theism and Explanation Could it m
Page 15 and 16:
4 Theism and Explanation While I ho
Page 17 and 18:
6 Theism and Explanation experiment
Page 19 and 20:
8 Theism and Explanation Plantinga
Page 21 and 22:
10 Theism and Explanation explanati
Page 23 and 24:
12 Theism and Explanation by refere
Page 25 and 26:
14 Theism and Explanation explanati
Page 27 and 28:
16 Theism and Explanation God creat
Page 30 and 31:
2 On Explanations in General “Exp
Page 32 and 33:
On Explanations in General 21 of ou
Page 34 and 35:
On Explanations in General 23 merel
Page 36 and 37:
Figure 2.2 Swinburne’s conception
Page 38 and 39:
On Explanations in General 27 simil
Page 40 and 41:
On Explanations in General 29 condi
Page 42 and 43:
On Explanations in General 31 could
Page 44 and 45:
3 What are Theistic Explanations? I
Page 46 and 47:
What are Theistic Explanations? 35
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
3.2.2 Positing a Divine Agent What
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
4 What Would They Explain? It’s a
Page 72 and 73:
4.2 SINGULAR AND GENERAL EXPLANATIO
Page 74 and 75:
What Would They Explain? 63 shelter
Page 76 and 77:
What Would They Explain? 65 were we
Page 78 and 79:
What Would They Explain? 67 not des
Page 80 and 81:
What Would They Explain? 69 must of
Page 82 and 83:
What Would They Explain? 71 to prod
Page 84 and 85:
What Would They Explain? 73 There i
Page 86:
What Would They Explain? 75 how mig
Page 89 and 90:
78 Theism and Explanation contradic
Page 91 and 92:
80 Theism and Explanation low—tha
Page 93 and 94:
82 Theism and Explanation 5.1.3 Is
Page 95 and 96:
84 Theism and Explanation eye. But
Page 97 and 98:
86 Theism and Explanation If we acc
Page 99 and 100:
88 Theism and Explanation Why not,
Page 101 and 102:
90 Theism and Explanation directly,
Page 103 and 104:
92 Theism and Explanation of divers
Page 105 and 106:
94 Theism and Explanation there can
Page 107 and 108:
96 Theism and Explanation already c
Page 109 and 110:
98 Theism and Explanation (2.1.2) t
Page 112 and 113:
6 Inference to the Best Explanation
Page 114 and 115:
Inference to the Best Explanation 1
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
7 Successful Theistic Explanations
Page 128 and 129:
Successful Theistic Explanations 11
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
8 Conclusion Miss Binney spoke as i
Page 156 and 157: Conclusion 145 explanation that met
Page 158 and 159: Appendix Intentional Explanations M
Page 160 and 161: Appendix 149 attend any discussion
Page 162 and 163: Appendix 151 explanation is a causa
Page 164 and 165: Appendix 153 we assume is a “myth
Page 166 and 167: Appendix 155 Will this suffi ce as
Page 168 and 169: Appendix 157 reasoning, Schueler su
Page 170 and 171: Appendix 159 action, one that has a
Page 172 and 173: Appendix 161 estimate of her charac
Page 174 and 175: Appendix 163 causal laws do exist.
Page 176 and 177: Appendix 165 this is the explanatio
Page 178 and 179: Notes NOTES TO CHAPTER 1 1. Numbers
Page 180 and 181: Notes 169 James Maclaurin has remin
Page 182 and 183: Notes 171 19. Musgrave, “Scientif
Page 184 and 185: Notes 173 the most explicit in its
Page 186 and 187: Notes 175 any true proposition, the
Page 188 and 189: Notes 177 weaker but to their mind
Page 190 and 191: Notes 179 15. Hume, “Dialogues,
Page 192 and 193: Notes 181 19. Swinburne, Is There a
Page 194 and 195: Notes 183 it will also confi rm H 2
Page 196 and 197: Notes 185 91. I am grateful to Geor
Page 198 and 199: Notes 187 this be a fatal objection
Page 200: Notes 189 71. Lakatos, “Falsifi c
Page 203 and 204: 192 Bibliography Behe, Michael J. D
Page 205: 194 Bibliography Dembski, William A
Page 209 and 210: 198 Bibliography Melnyk, Andrew. A
Page 211 and 212: 200 Bibliography Rundle, Bede. 2004
Page 214 and 215: Index A abduction: and induction, 1
Page 216 and 217: defences, and theodicies, 134-35 de
Page 218 and 219: intelligent design theory: argument
Page 220 and 221: preemption, causal. See causal pree
Page 222: tsunami, Boxing Day, 60, 61, 68, 14
show all

Theism and Explanation - Appeared-to-Blogly

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?