Theism and Explanation - Appeared-to-Blogly

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bibliography 193 Collins Robin. “God, Design, and Fine-Tuning.” In God Matters: Readings in the Philosophy of Religion, edited by Raymond Martin and Christopher Bernard, 119–35. New York: Longman Press, 2003. Colyvan, Mark. “The Ontological Commitments of Inconsistent Theories.” Philosophical Studies 141 (2008): 115–23. Copleston, Frederick, S.J. A History of Philosophy. 9 vols. Image Books. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1963. Craig, William Lane. The Kalām Cosmological Argument. Library of Philosophy and Theology. London: Macmillan, 1979. . “The Problem of Miracles: A Historical and Theological Perspective.” In Gospel Perspectives, vol. 6, The Miracles of Jesus, edited by David Wenham and Craig Bloomberg, 9–48. Sheffi eld: JSOT Press, 1986. Craig, William Lane and Quentin Smith. Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. Danto, Arthur C. “Basic Actions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (1965): 141–48. . Narration and Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985. Darwin, Charles. “Essay on Theology and Natural Selection” [1838]. Notes on John Macculloch’s Proofs and Illustrations of the Attributes of God, transcribed and annotated by Paul H. Barrett. In Darwin on Man: A Psychological Study of Scientifi c Creativity together with Darwin’s Early and Unpublished Notebooks by Howard E. Gruber, 414–22. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1974. . The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection [1859]. Pelican Classics. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin, 1968. Davidson, Donald. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes” [1963]. In Essays on Actions and Events, 3–19. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980. . “Causal Relations” [1967]. In Essays on Actions and Events, 149–62. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980. . “Freedom to Act” [1973]. In Essays on Actions and Events, 63–81. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980. . “How is Weakness of the Will Possible?” [1970]. In Essays on Actions and Events, 21–42. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980. . “Intending” [1978]. In Essays on Actions and Events, 83–102. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980. . “Mental Events” [1970]. In Essays on Actions and Events, 207–25. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980. . “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme” [1974]. In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 183–98. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984. . “Psychology as Philosophy” [1971]. In Essays on Actions and Events, 229–44. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980. Davis, E. A. and I. J. Falconer. J. J. Thomson and the Discovery of the Electron. London: Taylor & Francis, 1997. Davis, Lawrence D. “Review of On Action by Carl Ginet.” Mind 100 (1991): 390–94. Dawes, Gregory W. The Historical Jesus Question: The Challenge of History to Religious Authority. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2001. . “Paradigmatic Explanation: Strauss’s Dangerous Idea.” Louvain Studies 32 (2008): 64–77. . “Religious Studies, Faith, and the Presumption of Naturalism.” Journal of Religion and Society 5 (2003). http://www.creighton.edu/JRS . “What is Wrong with Intelligent Design?” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2007): 69–81. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker [1986]. London: Penguin, 1988.
194 Bibliography Dembski, William A. “Intelligent Design is not Optimal Design.” 2000. http:// www.designinference.com/documents/2000.02.ayala_response.htm . No Free Lunch: Why Specifi ed Complexity Cannot Be Purchased Without Intelligence. Langham, MD: Rowman & Littlefi eld, 2002. . “Obsessively Criticized but Scarcely Refuted: A Response to Richard Wein.” 2002. http://www.designinference.com/documents/05.02.resp_to_wein.htm Dennett, Daniel C. The Intentional Stance. A Bradford Book. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987. Depew, David J. and Bruce H. Weber. Darwinism Evolving: Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection. A Bradford Book. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995. Draper, Paul R. “God, Science, and Naturalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion, edited by William J. Wainwright, 272–303. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. . “Pain and Pleasure: An Evidential Problem for Theists.” Noûs 23 (1989): 331–50. Dray, William. Laws and Explanations in History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1957. Ducasse, Curt John. Causation and the Types of Necessity [1924]. New York: Dover Publications, 1969. . “Causation: Perceivable? or Only Inferred?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (1965): 173–79. Dyke, Heather. Metaphysics and the Representational Fallacy. Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2007. Earman, John. “Bayes, Hume, and Miracles.” Faith and Philosophy 10 (1993): 293–310. . Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confi rmation Theory. A Bradford Book. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992. . Hume’s Abject Failure: The Argument Against Miracles. Oxford University Press, 2000. Fakhry, Majid. “Classical Islamic Arguments for the Existence of God.” The Muslim World 47 (1957): 133–45. . A History of Islamic Philosophy. 2nd edition. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983. Feuerbach, Ludwig. The Essence of Christianity [1843]. Translated by Marian Evans. London: Trübner, 1881. . Lectures on the Essence of Religion [1851]. Translated by Ralph Mannheim. New York: Harper & Row, 1967. Flamm, Bruce L. “Faith Healing Confronts Modern Medicine.” The Scientifi c Review of Alternative Medicine 8:1 (Spring/Summer 2004): 9–14. Flew, Antony and Alasdair MacIntyre. New Essays in Philosophical Theology. London: SCM, 1955. Flew, Antony. God and Philosophy. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2005. Føllesdal. Dagfi nn “The Status of Rationality Assumptions in Interpretation and in the Explanation of Action.” Dialectica 36 (1982): 301–16. Freddoso, Alfred J. “God’s General Concurrence with Secondary Causes: Why Conservation is Not Enough” in Philosophical Perspectives V: Philosophy of Religion, edited by James E. Tomberlin, 553–85. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing, 1991. Gale, Barry G. Evolution without Evidence: Charles Darwin and The Origin of Species. Brighton: Harvester, 1982. Galilei, Galileo. The Assayer (1623). In The Controversy on the Comets of 1618. Translated by Stillman Drake and C. D. O’Malley, 151–336. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press, 1960.
Page 2 and 3:
Theism and Explanation
Page 4 and 5:
Theism and Explanation Gregory W. D
Page 6:
To Anna who never tires of asking
Page 10:
Acknowledgements My thanks are due
Page 13 and 14:
2 Theism and Explanation Could it m
Page 15 and 16:
4 Theism and Explanation While I ho
Page 17 and 18:
6 Theism and Explanation experiment
Page 19 and 20:
8 Theism and Explanation Plantinga
Page 21 and 22:
10 Theism and Explanation explanati
Page 23 and 24:
12 Theism and Explanation by refere
Page 25 and 26:
14 Theism and Explanation explanati
Page 27 and 28:
16 Theism and Explanation God creat
Page 30 and 31:
2 On Explanations in General “Exp
Page 32 and 33:
On Explanations in General 21 of ou
Page 34 and 35:
On Explanations in General 23 merel
Page 36 and 37:
Figure 2.2 Swinburne’s conception
Page 38 and 39:
On Explanations in General 27 simil
Page 40 and 41:
On Explanations in General 29 condi
Page 42 and 43:
On Explanations in General 31 could
Page 44 and 45:
3 What are Theistic Explanations? I
Page 46 and 47:
What are Theistic Explanations? 35
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
3.2.2 Positing a Divine Agent What
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
4 What Would They Explain? It’s a
Page 72 and 73:
4.2 SINGULAR AND GENERAL EXPLANATIO
Page 74 and 75:
What Would They Explain? 63 shelter
Page 76 and 77:
What Would They Explain? 65 were we
Page 78 and 79:
What Would They Explain? 67 not des
Page 80 and 81:
What Would They Explain? 69 must of
Page 82 and 83:
What Would They Explain? 71 to prod
Page 84 and 85:
What Would They Explain? 73 There i
Page 86:
What Would They Explain? 75 how mig
Page 89 and 90:
78 Theism and Explanation contradic
Page 91 and 92:
80 Theism and Explanation low—tha
Page 93 and 94:
82 Theism and Explanation 5.1.3 Is
Page 95 and 96:
84 Theism and Explanation eye. But
Page 97 and 98:
86 Theism and Explanation If we acc
Page 99 and 100:
88 Theism and Explanation Why not,
Page 101 and 102:
90 Theism and Explanation directly,
Page 103 and 104:
92 Theism and Explanation of divers
Page 105 and 106:
94 Theism and Explanation there can
Page 107 and 108:
96 Theism and Explanation already c
Page 109 and 110:
98 Theism and Explanation (2.1.2) t
Page 112 and 113:
6 Inference to the Best Explanation
Page 114 and 115:
Inference to the Best Explanation 1
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
7 Successful Theistic Explanations
Page 128 and 129:
Successful Theistic Explanations 11
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155: 8 Conclusion Miss Binney spoke as i
Page 156 and 157: Conclusion 145 explanation that met
Page 158 and 159: Appendix Intentional Explanations M
Page 160 and 161: Appendix 149 attend any discussion
Page 162 and 163: Appendix 151 explanation is a causa
Page 164 and 165: Appendix 153 we assume is a “myth
Page 166 and 167: Appendix 155 Will this suffi ce as
Page 168 and 169: Appendix 157 reasoning, Schueler su
Page 170 and 171: Appendix 159 action, one that has a
Page 172 and 173: Appendix 161 estimate of her charac
Page 174 and 175: Appendix 163 causal laws do exist.
Page 176 and 177: Appendix 165 this is the explanatio
Page 178 and 179: Notes NOTES TO CHAPTER 1 1. Numbers
Page 180 and 181: Notes 169 James Maclaurin has remin
Page 182 and 183: Notes 171 19. Musgrave, “Scientif
Page 184 and 185: Notes 173 the most explicit in its
Page 186 and 187: Notes 175 any true proposition, the
Page 188 and 189: Notes 177 weaker but to their mind
Page 190 and 191: Notes 179 15. Hume, “Dialogues,
Page 192 and 193: Notes 181 19. Swinburne, Is There a
Page 194 and 195: Notes 183 it will also confi rm H 2
Page 196 and 197: Notes 185 91. I am grateful to Geor
Page 198 and 199: Notes 187 this be a fatal objection
Page 200: Notes 189 71. Lakatos, “Falsifi c
Page 203: 192 Bibliography Behe, Michael J. D
Page 207 and 208: 196 Bibliography . A Treatise of Hu
Page 209 and 210: 198 Bibliography Melnyk, Andrew. A
Page 211 and 212: 200 Bibliography Rundle, Bede. 2004
Page 214 and 215: Index A abduction: and induction, 1
Page 216 and 217: defences, and theodicies, 134-35 de
Page 218 and 219: intelligent design theory: argument
Page 220 and 221: preemption, causal. See causal pree
Page 222: tsunami, Boxing Day, 60, 61, 68, 14
show all

Theism and Explanation - Appeared-to-Blogly

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?