04.06.2013 Views

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116 The OrganizaTiOnal hisTOry <strong>Of</strong> field arTillery<br />

then available, both in the Regular <strong>Army</strong> and National Guard. Therefore, during<br />

World War I, the Coast Artillery Corps manned artillery materiel above the 6-inch<br />

(155-mm.) howitzer level, most of the trench mortar artillery, and the antiaircraft<br />

artil lery units. 67<br />

At the beginning of the war, there was only enough artillery to equip about three<br />

and a half reduced-strength army corps, and much of that equipment was obsolete.<br />

Ammunition was also in short supply, and production facilities for both artillery<br />

and ammunition were limited. Even if the ammunition had been forthcoming, the<br />

existing pieces were too few in number to fully use it. Upon entering the war, the<br />

<strong>Army</strong> had only five hundred forty-four 3-inch (1902 model) guns; sixty 4.7-inch<br />

guns; and about three hundred other pieces of various calibers. This materiel had<br />

to be distributed immediately among the field artillery regiments being organized<br />

for the war. One result was that some of the divisional artillery brigades had only<br />

one to four guns for their regiments. Because the 75-mm. gun was already in production<br />

and in action on the front, steps were taken to purchase arms from France.<br />

The abandonment of the 3-inch gun, which was an excellent weapon (especially<br />

its carriage), caused much criticism; but, in addition to easing the supply problem,<br />

the adoption of uniform weapons in the American and French armies simplified<br />

training. France, in exchange for metal and other materials, supplied the AEF with<br />

3,128 field pieces (eighteen hundred sixty-two 75-mm. guns, two hundred thirtythree<br />

155-mm. guns, seven hundred ninety-six 155-mm. howitzers, and two hundred<br />

thirty-seven trench mortars), other artillery materiel, ammunition, and balloon and<br />

airplane units. After the war, the 75-mm. French gun became the standard American<br />

divisional field piece, although the National Guard continued to use the 3-inch gun<br />

as late as 1920. 68 Production in quantity of the 75-mm. gun in the United States<br />

followed the end of the war. The U.S. <strong>Army</strong> later improved the weapon by adding<br />

its own panoramic sight and by equipping the carriage with rubber tires.<br />

Prior to 1914, the French had failed to develop adequate medium or heavy<br />

artillery. As a result, they initially had only about 300 pieces of higher-caliber<br />

artillery opposing about 3,500 heavier German weapons. The French promptly<br />

took measures to correct this deficiency, and by early 1918, the GPF (Grande puissance<br />

Filloux “Great power Filloux”) 155-mm. gun was in production. In addition<br />

67 Annual Reports of the War Department, 1917, 1:929. Information on these units will be included<br />

in a forthcoming Air Defense Artillery volume.<br />

68 United States <strong>Army</strong> in the World War, 14:82–84; William J. Snow, “Wartime Procurement of<br />

<strong>Field</strong> Artillery Materiel,” <strong>Field</strong> Artillery Journal, March 1941, pp. 167–70; idem, “Gun Procurement,”<br />

<strong>Field</strong> Artillery Journal, May 1941, pp. 299–304; Ltr, Munitions Board to SecWar Newton D. Baker,<br />

28 Dec 16, sub: Data on Manufacture of Munitions, 1916, box 13, Summer all Papers, Ms Div, LC; H.<br />

A. DeWeerd, “American Adoption of French Artillery, 1917–1918,” Journal of the American <strong>Military</strong><br />

Institute 3 (Summer 1939): 104–16; U.S. Congress, House, <strong>Army</strong> Appropriation Bill for 1917: Hearings<br />

Before the Committee on <strong>Military</strong> Affairs, 64th Cong. 1st sess., 4 Apr 1916, pp. 721–94; Conrad H. Lanza,<br />

“<strong>Army</strong> Artil lery, American First <strong>Army</strong>,” pt. 1, p. ii, copy in CMH files; Annual Reports of the War Department,<br />

1919, 1:3911–14; Benedict Crowell, America’s Munitions, 1917–1918 (Washington, D.C.: U.S.<br />

Government Printing <strong>Of</strong>fice, 1920), pp. 69–71. See also Edward M. Coffman, The War To End All Wars<br />

(1968; reprint, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1986), pp. 40–42, concerning the adoption of the<br />

French gun rather than the 1902 3-inch field gun.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!