04.06.2013 Views

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eOrganizing The arm<br />

traveling forge was authorized for each company of light artillery and for every two<br />

companies of foot artillery. 34<br />

During most of the period since 1784, procurement and development of materiel<br />

had been functions of the artillery, but on 14 May 1814, Congress established<br />

the Ordnance Department. The Commissary-General of Ordnance, the title of the<br />

department chief, was charged with not only inspecting and approving all ordnance<br />

pieces, cannon balls, shot, and shell but also directing the construction of carriages<br />

and other apparatus for field and garrison service. Col. Decius Wadsworth, a former<br />

artillery company commander, was appointed to this position and was later designated<br />

as Chief of Ordnance on 8 February 1815. 35<br />

The principal fighting strength on both sides during the War of 1812 lay in the<br />

infantry. During the war, most of the artillerists manned various ord nance pieces<br />

wherever they might be posted and fought as infantry when necessary. The 3d<br />

Artillery Regiment served primarily as infantry on the New York–Canadian frontier,<br />

with some companies performing as foot artillery along the Atlantic coast. Many of<br />

the line officers were detached as district commanders or as staff officers in other<br />

departments. Few artillerymen were capable of employing artillery in a battlefield<br />

environment, fewer yet understood the value of “field” artillery, and infantry commanders<br />

had even less knowledge of field artillery tactics. There was little hope<br />

of salvaging the situation, for the <strong>Army</strong> had no senior artillery officers to direct<br />

any emphasis toward the arm. During the war, a few com panies of the 1st and 2d<br />

Regiments served as true field artil lery and were occasionally effective—the 12pounder<br />

batteries at the battle of Chippewa, for example—but they never concentrated<br />

their efforts. The infantry battle lines usually formed just beyond effective<br />

artillery range (about 500 yards), and accompany ing artillery was employed primarily<br />

as “position artillery,” its use limited to repelling the opposing force’s attack. 36<br />

The War Department had intended to mount the Regiment of Light Artillery, but<br />

within six months of the declaration of war, only half the companies were equipped<br />

as such. The regiment seldom operated as light artillery, however, and when it did,<br />

it was by small detachments. Light artillery was a new institution in the United<br />

States, and the officers and men lacked peacetime, much less wartime, experience.<br />

Because the terrain did not favor massed cavalry, many viewed horse artillery as<br />

unnecessary. By the end of the war, most of the companies in the Regiment of Light<br />

Artillery had been reequipped as infantry. 37<br />

34 <strong>Military</strong> Laws, and Rules and Regulations for the <strong>Army</strong> of the United States (Washington City,<br />

December 1814), p. 84.<br />

35 Callan, comp., <strong>Military</strong> Laws, pp. 226–27, 263–66; Francis B. Heitman, Historical Register and<br />

Dictionary of the United States <strong>Army</strong> . . . , 2 vols. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing <strong>Of</strong>fice,<br />

1903), 1:43–44.<br />

36 Birkhimer, Historical Sketch, pp. 193–200; American State Papers, Class 5, <strong>Military</strong> Affairs,<br />

1:439–512; H[enry] M. Brackenridge, <strong>History</strong> of the Late War Between the United States and Great Britain<br />

. . . , 6th ed. (Philadelphia: James Kay, Jun. and Brother, 1836), pp. 180–86; Nathaniel Herbert Claiborne,<br />

Notes on the War in the South . . . (Richmond, Va.: W. Ramsey, 1819), pp. 21–23; Robert S. Quimby, The<br />

U.S. <strong>Army</strong> in the War of 1812 (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1997), pp. 521–27.<br />

37 Birkhimer, Historical Sketch, pp. 192–99.<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!