04.06.2013 Views

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 The OrganizaTiOnal hisTOry <strong>Of</strong> field arTillery<br />

new super intendent in 1838, artillery<br />

instruction received greater empha sis.<br />

Hunt had also assisted in revising a<br />

manual on field artillery tactics for the<br />

War Department, published in 1860,<br />

and was now prepared to command.<br />

However, General McClellan, taking<br />

the traditional view of artillery<br />

command, wanted his artillery chief<br />

to perform solely administrative and<br />

staff duties, exercising command only<br />

upon receipt of specific orders from<br />

the commanding general. Although<br />

Hunt finally persuaded McClellan to<br />

broaden his authority over the artillery,<br />

his powers and responsibilities would<br />

vary greatly according to the whims of<br />

succeeding army commanders. 33<br />

With the battery as the primary<br />

organizational unit, Union artillery<br />

suffered from the lack of field-grade<br />

officers. When artillery captains were<br />

promoted, most were promoted in the<br />

Volunteers and given command of<br />

regiments, brigades, and divisions.<br />

Sergeants were then commissioned to take over the batter ies, and the ranks were<br />

filled with recruits. Promotions and transfers into volunteer organizations, where<br />

opportunities for advancement were plentiful, weakened the Regular batteries. In<br />

1863 two colonels, a major, three captains, and a lieutenant commanded the artillery<br />

of seven corps. Two captains command ed two horse artillery brigades, and there<br />

was one field-grade officer in the reserve. Hunt believed that most of these commands<br />

in any other army would have been considered proper for general officers.<br />

Twenty-one field-grade artillery officers in the Regular <strong>Army</strong> became generals in<br />

the Volunteers, but only two remained with the artillery branch. 34 Colonel Hunt<br />

In 1865, Hunt<br />

described the problem as follows:<br />

33 Edward G. Longacre, The Man Behind the Guns (New Brunswick, N.J.: A. S. Barnes and Co.,<br />

1977), pp. 18, 67–69, 99, 119, 261. In 1856 Hunt, along with Barry and William G. French, was directed<br />

to serve on a board tasked with revising Robert Anderson’s 1839 field artillery instruction text (including<br />

revisions of 1845). The revision took until March 1860, and it was published later that year as Instruction<br />

for <strong>Field</strong> Artillery by J. B. Lippincott. The new work and the French-based text Evolu tion of <strong>Field</strong> Batteries<br />

of Artillery, translated by Robert Anderson, were widely used during the war.<br />

34 War Department, War of the Rebellion, 1/27(pt.1):242; Tidball, “Remarks Upon <strong>Field</strong> Artillery,”<br />

pp. 15–16, FA School files; Annual Report of the Secretary of War, 1913, 1:207–08.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!