04.06.2013 Views

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

wOrld war ii<br />

163<br />

authorized six 105-mm. towed howit zers. The M3 model howitzer was standard<br />

for the infantry cannon com pany during World War II, as it was for some of the<br />

airborne division artillery. This model differed slightly from the M2A1 model used<br />

in the infantry division artillery, and because it was twenty-seven inches shorter,<br />

artillerymen often called it the “snub-nosed” or “sawed-off” 105. The cannon<br />

company was not an unqualified success, primarily because of its lack of mobility<br />

and because in many situations it was tied in with the fire direc tion center of the<br />

supporting division artillery in mass fire missions. Most division com manders felt<br />

that many problems would have been solved by using self-propelled howitzers (as<br />

those in the armored division artillery) instead of towed ones. 12<br />

Other Division Artillery<br />

The field artillery battalions organized for motorized, light, and mountain divisions<br />

were similar to those in the infantry division. The battalions authorized for the<br />

motorized divi sion (deleted from the force structure in 1943) were the same as those<br />

authorized for the standard infantry division. The light division artillery organizations<br />

(for use in mountain, jungle, and amphib ious opera tions) were each authorized a<br />

headquarters and head quarters detachment, three 75-mm. pack howitzer battal ions,<br />

an antiair craft artillery machine-gun battalion, and an antitank battery. Each howitzer<br />

battalion had a headquarters and service battery and three four-piece firing batteries,<br />

for an aggregate personnel strength of 469. The antiaircraft artillery battalion<br />

of 292 officers and enlisted men was armed with .50-caliber machine guns, and the<br />

antitank battery, with an author ized aggregate strength of 133, was equipped with<br />

an additional twelve pack howitzers and eight 2.36-inch bazookas. Eight airplanes<br />

for observation were also included in the light division’s artillery. One division (the<br />

89th) was authorized trucks instead of animals for the artillery, and the tables were<br />

adjusted accordingly. The organization of the light division was approved in the<br />

summer of 1943, but experience gained in maneuvers and in the Pacific proved that<br />

such forces had to be reinforced immediately and that they needed artillery heavier<br />

than the 75-mm. pack howitzer. Two of the three light divisions were reorganized<br />

as standard infantry divisions by 1944, while one remained in the force structure<br />

as a mountain division having a total strength of 13,459. 13<br />

The 1944 tables called for the mountain division artillery to be organized with<br />

an aggregate strength of 1,783 in a headquarters and headquarters bat tery and<br />

three 75-mm. pack howitzer battalions (twelve howitzers in each battalion). The<br />

antiaircraft artillery battalion was converted to an infantry antitank battalion, and<br />

12 Mahon and Danysh, Infantry, pp. 53–54, 63–64, 66–67; General Board, <strong>US</strong>FET, “Organization,<br />

Equipment, and Tactical Employment of the Infantry Divi sion,” Study no. 15, pp. 5–6, copy in CMH<br />

files; Charles B. MacDonald, The Siegfried Line Campaign (Washington, D.C.: <strong>Of</strong>fice of the Chief of<br />

<strong>Military</strong> <strong>History</strong>, 1963), p. 621. For background on the idea of an accompanying gun, see Grotelueschen,<br />

Doctrine Under Trial, pp. 78–81, 128–29.<br />

13 TOE 72T, 21 Jan 1944, and related tables; TOE 72T (Truck), 21 Jan 1944, and related tables;<br />

Greenfield, Palmer, and Wiley, Organization of Ground Combat Troops, pp. 339–50; Robert C. Gildart,<br />

“Artillery on New Georgia, <strong>Field</strong> Artillery Journal, February 1944, pp. 88–89.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!