04.06.2013 Views

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

146 THE ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY OF FIELD ARTILLERY<br />

in the individual projec tile and that the<br />

key to success lay in the massing of<br />

fires on decisive points. Rarely in war,<br />

he reasoned, would there be sufficient<br />

artillery to cover all points thoroughly<br />

and contin uously; therefore, fire should<br />

be massed in succession on the most important<br />

targets. The procedure required<br />

centralized control, great flexibility in<br />

delivery, considerable range, and good<br />

communications. Given improved<br />

methods of fire direction (using firing<br />

charts on which base points46 were<br />

plotted with fair accuracy), McNair<br />

thought that the gain in close support<br />

in the proposed division was more than<br />

offset by the loss in effective artillery<br />

support as a whole. If artillery lost its<br />

power to mass fires over a wide front<br />

and was dissipated in local combat, then<br />

it would no longer exert the influence<br />

that had given it such importance in the<br />

past. McNair urged that close-support<br />

weapons (the light guns, howitzers,<br />

and mortars) be kept at a minimum and<br />

general-support weapons at a maximum. The division needed more of the heavier<br />

weapons and fewer of the lighter ones. 47<br />

General McNair<br />

Others, too, had mixed reactions concerning the proper armament of the proposed<br />

division’s artillery. For general support, the 155-mm. howitzer was preferred to the<br />

105-mm. howitzer because it had adequate mobility, it was more powerful, and, most<br />

of all, it was available. The prime mover was thought to be too heavy, but it could<br />

be lightened. There was a general trend to have weapons of heavier calibers than the<br />

75-mm. gun for direct support. Because many artillery officers considered the 75-mm.<br />

gun unsatisfactory given its comparatively flat trajectory and small projectile, some<br />

hoped that the 105-mm. howitzer, when introduced, would replace the 75-mm. gun<br />

instead of the 155-mm. howitzer. The 105-mm. howitzer was a better weapon against<br />

personnel in the open. The German army was rearming with a new 105-mm. howitzer,<br />

and other major powers were taking an interest in the weapon. Even though the<br />

United States increased its interest in the 105-mm. howitzer, there were still too many<br />

46 The term registration point rather than base point is now used for specifying a precise target<br />

location and for plotting precise firing data, after which fires are shifted to other targets in the general<br />

area. A firing chart is a map, photo map, or grid sheet showing the relative horizontal and vertical<br />

positions of batteries, base points, base point lines, check points, targets, and other data needed in<br />

preparing firing data.<br />

47 Memo, McNair for CG, 2d Div, 8 Apr 37, copy in MHI files.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!