04.06.2013 Views

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 13<br />

Toward a New Century<br />

The decade of the 1990s ushered in myriad regional threats to the security of<br />

the United States. By May 1991, the INF Treaty had contained the nuclear threat of<br />

the superpowers, and the official disintegration of the Warsaw Pact in July and the<br />

Soviet Union in December reduced the number of superpowers to one—the United<br />

States. <strong>Army</strong> commanders realized that Europe would not necessarily be the only<br />

battlefield, and they became increasingly concerned about other likely trouble spots,<br />

such as the Middle East and Latin America.<br />

The first sign of the new challenges to come had occurred in October 1983<br />

in Grenada. <strong>Field</strong> artillery played only a minor role in Operation ur G e n t Fu r y,<br />

chiefly because planners did not consider enemy artillery a threat and because they<br />

wanted to keep the deployed force light. Also, the desire to limit collateral damage<br />

and civilian casualties, requiring positive identification of a hostile enemy force,<br />

mitigated the use of indirect fire. Operations there did, however, point out the need<br />

for more planning at the joint level. 1<br />

The next involvement in Latin America came in 1990 during Operation Ju s t<br />

Ca u s e in Panama. Here too the mission, enemy, terrain, troops, and time available<br />

also restricted artillery fire, although the presence of field artillery had a strong deterrent<br />

effect. For example, artillery in the 7th Infantry Division fired intermittently,<br />

discouraging sniper attacks, and similar positions at roadblocks and checkpoints<br />

enhanced security. 2<br />

Operation De s e r t st o r m<br />

Full-scale warfare reappeared in early 1991 with the offensive in the Persian<br />

Gulf region against the Iraqi <strong>Army</strong>, which validated the U.S. <strong>Army</strong>’s twenty-year<br />

effort to reform and modernize its forces. To be sure, for Operation De s e r t st o r m,<br />

the United States and its coalition partners possessed air superiority; had a six-month<br />

period to build up their formations during Operation De s e r t sh i e l D; enjoyed terrain<br />

and weather excellent for conventional fighting; and, most importantly, were<br />

highly trained and technologically sophisticated compared to the unmotivated,<br />

undisciplined, poorly trained and equipped Iraqi soldiers. Both sides employed a<br />

1 Scott R. McMichael, “Urgent Fury,” <strong>Field</strong> Artillery Journal, March-April 1985, pp. 8–13.<br />

2 Joseph E. DeFrancisco, “Bayonet Artillery in Operation Just Cause,” <strong>Field</strong> Artillery, June 1990,<br />

pp. 6–11; Robert S. Ballagh, Jr., “Red Devil Redlegs,” ibid., October 1990, pp. 40–42.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!