04.06.2013 Views

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

58 The OrganizaTiOnal hisTOry <strong>Of</strong> field arTillery<br />

units had been withdrawn or the temporary ones that encircled the capital. Most,<br />

however, were employed in the field, where their lack of training was at least partially<br />

overcome by their enthusiasm and by the assistance of the regular artillery. 27<br />

Except for the few Regular <strong>Army</strong> companies organized as garrison artillery,<br />

heavy artillery came from volunteer and state organizations. The soldiers were<br />

armed and equipped as infantry and were used to guard the trains and perform other<br />

camp duties either with the active field armies or as garrison troops and guards at<br />

fortified places and depots. A number of heavy regiments were also called to the<br />

front to perform as infantry. 28<br />

As in the Mexican War, artillery batteries were at first distributed to infantry<br />

brigades, and none was retained as a reserve. At the battle of Bull Run in the summer<br />

of 1861, the field artillery batteries served at the brigade level with unsatisfactory<br />

results. Nine incomplete Regular <strong>Army</strong> batteries, along with a volunteer battery,<br />

manned forty-nine artillery pieces of varying types and calibers. The artillery, however,<br />

was badly managed. Although the Union army commander, Brig. Gen. Irvin<br />

McDowell, had appointed Maj. William F. Barry as his artillery chief, he retained<br />

tactical control over the batteries and only used Barry to pass on any orders to the<br />

artillery. Given the initial unhappy experience with decentralization and the increasing<br />

influence of the Napoleonic model, which called for artillery to be placed with<br />

divisions and corps and the retention of a reserve to throw forward in an offensive<br />

operation, the Union army eventually reorganized the arm. 29<br />

When Maj. Gen. George B. McClellan took over the <strong>Army</strong> of the Potomac after<br />

Bull Run, he selected Major Barry as his artillery chief and Maj. Henry J. Hunt as<br />

head of the Artillery Reserve and aide-de-camp, earning a promotion to colonel in<br />

the Volunteers. McClellan proceeded to reorganize his force into eleven divi sions,<br />

each comprising three infantry brigades, a cavalry regi ment, and four six-gun batteries.<br />

This divisional structure was generally accepted for other Union armies as<br />

well. Barry immediately established some principles for organizing the artillery.<br />

The proportion of guns to other troops was to be at least 2.5 and preferably 3 to each<br />

1,000 men, and field batteries were to contain six pieces if practicable. No battery<br />

was to have fewer than four guns, and all guns in the same battery were to be of the<br />

same caliber. With a few exceptions, field guns were to be restricted to Ordnance<br />

Department and Parrott rifles and the Napoleons. A reserve artillery of one hundred<br />

cannon was to be organized and a fifty-piece siege train procured.<br />

Each division was to have four field artillery batteries. <strong>Of</strong> the four divisional<br />

batteries, one was to be formed from the Regular <strong>Army</strong> and the remainder from the<br />

Volunteers. The captain of the Regular <strong>Army</strong> battery was to command the divisional<br />

artillery, and he was to direct the instruction of the volunteer batteries in gunnery<br />

27 Naisawald, Grape and Canister, p. 35; George B. McClellan, Letter of the Secretary of War, Transmitting<br />

Report on the Organization of the <strong>Army</strong> of the Potomac . . . (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government<br />

Printing <strong>Of</strong>fice, 1864), p. 4.<br />

28 See Dyer, Compendium.<br />

29 War Department, War of the Rebellion, 1/2:314–15, 345–48; Naisawald, Grape and Canister, pp.<br />

23–25; McClellan, Letter, p. 13; Birkhimer, Historical Sketch, pp. 78–80.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!