04.06.2013 Views

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The nUclear arena<br />

Lance missile<br />

235<br />

design problems with the Lance’s propellant-feed system, Secretary of Defense<br />

Robert S. McNamara in December 1967 suspended its development and continued<br />

work only on the extended-range Lance. The basic Lance equipped with either a<br />

nuclear or conventional warhead would have been accurate enough at shorter ranges.<br />

When only the extended-range Lance was to be developed, its dual role as a nuclear<br />

and conventional weapon changed to only nuclear. Thereafter, the Lance became a<br />

corps-support weapon rather than both a divisional- and corps-support weapon.<br />

The first flight test of the extended-range Lance (renamed simply Lance)<br />

occurred on 6 May 1969, and an initial production model was delivered to the<br />

<strong>Army</strong> for testing in April 1971. The <strong>Army</strong> launched its first Lance in August of<br />

that year and completed service test ing the following March. In May 1972, the<br />

Lance, designated as a standard missile, proved to be a vast improvement over<br />

the old Honest John, which was dependent upon roads for its wheeled launcher<br />

and support vehicles as well as upon a well-prepared firing area to carry out its<br />

mission. By contrast, the Lance’s mobility over rough terrain made it possible for<br />

the crew (eight men) to fire from positions unsuitable for a rocket; it had a low<br />

silhouette and the general appearance of a vehicle common to the battlefield; it<br />

was small and easy to conceal and more difficult to identify as a nuclear-delivery<br />

vehicle; it could operate under all weather conditions in which infantry, armor,<br />

mechanized, or airborne troops might be committed; and its advanced guidance<br />

system was invulnerable to all known electronic countermeasures. Maintenance<br />

problems were minuscule in comparison to earlier missile systems, and the requirement<br />

for specially trained technical personnel diminished. 65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!