04.06.2013 Views

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

234 The OrganizaTiOnal hisTOry <strong>Of</strong> field arTillery<br />

In December 1979, new tables eliminated the service battery in each battalion.<br />

Instead, the functions passed to a maintenance battalion for the entire brigade<br />

(later command), which included a headquarters and headquarters company, three<br />

forward support companies, a maintenance and supply company, and an aviation<br />

support company. 61<br />

Following standard operating procedure, the Pershing firing units were required<br />

to serve at areas far from the rest of the battalion. The QRA mission necessitated the<br />

full-time commitment of one firing battery (or its equivalent) from each battalion.<br />

That battery maintained its “ready-to-fire” position at an improved but remote firing<br />

site located a considerable distance from its garrison. The QRA mission rotated<br />

among the four batteries about every six weeks, but the entire battalion stood ready<br />

to support the QRA battery on short notice. 62<br />

Lance Missile<br />

While the Pershing battalions were being reorganized, the Lance missile became<br />

opera tional. 63 The Lance was conceived in a staff study in 1956, but the con tract for its<br />

development was not issued until November 1962. At the time, the <strong>Army</strong> envisioned<br />

it as a replace ment for the Honest John in a divisio nal and corps general-support<br />

mission. Later, it was also seen as a replacement for the Little John and Lacrosse. The<br />

concept for the Lance was based on simpli city, ruggedness, reliability, accuracy, and<br />

low cost. It was the first <strong>Army</strong> missile to use prepackaged storable liquid fuel. Liquid<br />

fuel provided complete and uniform burning, advantages that increased accuracy and<br />

resulted in a more efficient means of propulsion. Prepackaging eliminated the lengthy<br />

onsite fueling process, the ground-support equipment, and the attendant personnel<br />

of the Corporal and Redstone missiles. The simplicity of the equip ment used to<br />

transport and launch the Lance gave the system far greater mobility than the Honest<br />

John. Its basic vehicle was similar to the M113 armored personnel carrier, which had<br />

adequate cross-country mobility and the ability to cross inland waterways without<br />

assistance. The second vehicle, also based on the armored personnel carrier, was a<br />

loader-transporter used to trans port the missiles and load them on the self-pro pelled<br />

launcher. A lightweight launcher, towed by a standard <strong>Army</strong> 2½-ton truck, was<br />

available as an alternate launching method. The components were also transportable<br />

by helicopter and could be dropped successfully by parachute. 64<br />

In 1966, the <strong>Army</strong> began parallel development of an extended-range Lance (also<br />

known as XRL), which was intended to replace the Sergeant. Because of severe<br />

60 TOE 6–615H, 15 Feb 1974.<br />

61 TOE 9–115H, 28 Dec 1979, Maintenance Battalion (Pershing), replaced TOE 6–619H, 15 Feb<br />

1974, Service Battery, Pershing Battalion.<br />

62 Jolliff, “<strong>History</strong> of the Pershing,” 20 May 1974, ch. 14, AMCOM files and copy in CMH files;<br />

Baker, “Pershing,” p. 12.<br />

63 AMC Annual Rpt of Major Activities, FY 1974, p. 60, AMCOM files and copy in CMH files.<br />

64 AMC Annual Historical Summary, FY 1963, pp. 87–92, AMCOM files and copy in CMH files;<br />

Roger C. Laudati, “Lance,” Infantry, September-October 1965, pp. 24–27.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!