04.06.2013 Views

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

276 The OrganizaTiOnal hisTOry <strong>Of</strong> field arTillery<br />

The far-reaching mobility of most <strong>Army</strong> field artillery units allowed them<br />

to be widely deployed and thinly dispersed, yet still operate effec tively. Just<br />

after its arrival in South Vietnam, the 1st Cavalry Division moved north to<br />

Pleiku Province and saw combat in the Ia Drang Valley, popularly known as<br />

the battle of the Ia Drang. The fighting between October and November 1965<br />

was noteworthy, validating two aspects of the airmobility concept—the use of<br />

helicopters to move and supply cannon artillery, and the use of aerial rocket<br />

artillery at night and in extremely close support of ground troops. A prolonged<br />

pursuit of the enemy by a large unit operating continuously over difficult terrain<br />

and relying primarily on aircraft in every aspect of the opera tion was a first.<br />

The helicopters, primarily CH–47s, made it possible to position and supply the<br />

artillery units, thus allowing the infantry to have almost con tinuous coverage<br />

in support of their ground operations. 20 During the 35-day battle, the 1st Cavalry<br />

Division Artillery fired 33,108 rounds of 105-mm. ammuni tion and 7,356<br />

rockets (2.75-inch). The concept of displacing and supplying artillery by air<br />

proved valid, and during the cam paign, the artillery made seventy-nine tactical<br />

moves, of which sixty-seven were by air. 21<br />

The aerial rocket artillery battalion was particularly responsive and effective in<br />

augmenting ground artillery fire, especially when it was needed beyond the range of<br />

the divi sion’s conventional artillery. Aerial rocket fire was also inval u able during<br />

the most critical phase of the airmobile opera tion—just after the unit’s arrival in a<br />

landing zone. The aerial rocket artillery battalion was best employed in a reinforcing<br />

role, with one of its three batteries habitually attached to one of the division’s three<br />

direct-support artillery battal ions. The main armament of the battalion consisted of<br />

2.75-inch folding-fin rockets, mounted first on UH–1 and later on AH–1 helicopters.<br />

Subsequently, some helicopters were equipped with SS–11 antitank wire-guided<br />

missiles, which were extremely effective against both enemy tanks and such point<br />

targets as bunkers and other fortifications. 22<br />

While <strong>Army</strong> planners had designed the 1st Cavalry Division, and later the 101st<br />

Airborne Division, to make maximum use of helicopters, the other maneuver units<br />

that followed also employed them extensively to move their troops, weapons, and<br />

supplies, getting them from the corps-level aviation groups. Thus almost all infantry<br />

units in Vietnam operated as airmobile infantry, and their supporting artillery<br />

served in an airmobile role alongside them. The airmobility concept allowed the<br />

artillery to travel deep into roadless areas in support of the infantry; the firebases,<br />

which were established, supplied, and evacuated by air, were the key for mobile<br />

large-unit operations deep into enemy territory.<br />

20 AAR, Pleiku Campaign, 1st Cav Div (Ambl), 4 Mar 1966, pp. 4–5, 12, 18, 21, 24, 28, 60, 78, 84,<br />

87–88, 90, 102, 123, 127–128, copy in CMH files.<br />

21 Ibid., pp. 4–5, copy in CMH files.<br />

22 Picou, “Aerial Fire Support,” pp. 46–48, 53–54; William F. Brand, Jr., E. K. Johnson, and Morris<br />

J. Brady, “Airmobility Firepower—Hallmark of the 1st Cavalry Division,” United States <strong>Army</strong> Aviation<br />

Digest, March 1967, pp. 18–23; Hay, Tactical and Materiel Innovations, pp. 28, 33; Elizabeth C. Jolliff,<br />

“<strong>History</strong> of the U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Missile Command, 1962–1977,” Historical Monograph Project no. DAR-<br />

COM–84M, 20 July 1979, pp. 117, 122–24, 127–39, AMCOM files and copy in CMH files.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!