04.06.2013 Views

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eOrganizing The arm<br />

Not until 1832 did the question arise<br />

again, and successive ordnance boards<br />

all moved in the direction of returning<br />

to bronze. The one that met in January<br />

1841 unanimously recom mended that<br />

bronze be used for manufacturing light<br />

artillery pieces, and Secretary of War<br />

Joel Poinsett concurred. This decision<br />

remained in effect until rifled field<br />

pieces replaced smooth bores. It was<br />

not until the latter part of the century<br />

that the combination of available highquality<br />

steel, industrial facilities, and<br />

improved production techniques made<br />

it possible to manufacture large numbers<br />

of light, strong steel weapons. 60<br />

In 1839, Secretary Poinsett had<br />

appointed a board to devise a system<br />

of artillery weapons for the <strong>Army</strong>.<br />

After ten years of studies and visits<br />

to foreign countries to examine other<br />

artillery systems and manufacturing<br />

methods, board member Capt. Alfred<br />

Mordecai prepared the report, which<br />

was approved and published in 1849.<br />

It listed the artillery materiel avail able<br />

with exact detail and specifications and<br />

included drawings. The cannon, as they<br />

had been in the past, were classi fied<br />

accord ing to use: field, siege and garrison,<br />

and seacoast (Table 5). 61<br />

Brigadier General Tyler in his Civil<br />

War uniform<br />

The board had considered European developments in the use of light or horse<br />

artillery. Under the 1821 reorganization, one company in each regiment was supposed<br />

to have been organized and equipped as light artillery, but until 1838, the only<br />

signifi cance of being designated as horse artillery had been that each company was<br />

equipped with four bronze 6-pounders (light artillery guns) instead of heavier cannon,<br />

and each drilled using a light artillery manual. The units were not authorized<br />

60 Benét, Collection of Annual Reports, 1:363 and 2:35–36, 76, 183–84, 240–41, 281–82, 364,<br />

500, 527, 552, 594, 597, 600–03, 611–12, 646, 667, 668, 671–72, 678–79, 687, 690; Falk, “Artillery<br />

for the Land Service,” pp. 101–03; <strong>Field</strong> Artillery School, <strong>History</strong> of the Development of <strong>Field</strong><br />

Artillery Materiel (Fort Sill, Okla.: Printing Plant, <strong>Field</strong> Artillery School, [1941]), pp. 31–32; Lewis,<br />

Seacoast Fortifications, p. 75.<br />

61 Falk, “Artillery for the Land Service,” pp. 104–10.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!