04.06.2013 Views

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

224 The OrganizaTiOnal hisTOry <strong>Of</strong> field arTillery<br />

related to accuracy and range. The missile was to have a circular error probable 32<br />

of not more than 5 yards (4.6 meters), a requirement that made the development<br />

of its guidance system the most difficult aspect. Its range was to fall between a<br />

minimum of 1,000 yards (914.4 meters) and a maximum of 20,000 yards (18,288<br />

meters), with anti-jamming and in-flight self-destruct devices to be incorporated<br />

into the design. 33<br />

In late 1949, the Joint Chiefs of Staff announced that the <strong>Army</strong> would have<br />

responsibility for ground-launched short-range surface-to-surface missiles supplanting<br />

or extending the capabilities of conventional artillery. The Navy-sponsored<br />

Lacrosse missile thus moved to the <strong>Army</strong> on 31 August 1950. 34<br />

With the impetus of the Korean War and increased support by the <strong>Army</strong>, development<br />

of the Lacrosse was stepped up. In time, however, myriad problems—<br />

funding restrictions, unsolved technical problems, poor management, schedule<br />

slippages, cost overages, mounting user criticism, and declining confidence in<br />

tactical utility—surfaced that plagued progress for almost nine years. 35 Also,<br />

significant changes were made in the requirements: an increase in warhead weight<br />

from 100 to 500 pounds; an increase in minimum and maximum ranges; a decision<br />

to use a solid propellant motor; and a decision to adapt both atomic and optimum<br />

fragmentation warheads for the missile, permitting employment of the system in a<br />

general-support role. The statement of military characteris tics for a close-support<br />

field artillery guided missile system approved in January 1956 was in effect less<br />

than three months when the <strong>Army</strong> reclas sified the weapon as a general-support<br />

field artillery guided missile system. The revised military charac teristics, published<br />

on 13 June 1957, stated that the missile was to be employed as corps artillery in<br />

general-support and reinforcing roles against appropriate personnel and materiel<br />

targets, including heavy fortifications. It also was to be capable of delivering accurate<br />

close-support fire and have sufficient mobility to permit tactical employment<br />

similar to that of medium artillery. Under the new operational concept, the<br />

forward observer section was to be organized and equipped to work with division<br />

artillery in support of airborne, infantry, and armor units, and all forward observer<br />

guidance equipment was to be man-transportable. The new military characteristics<br />

required modifi cations of certain performance characteris tics, further delaying<br />

the program. 36<br />

To resolve the electronic countermeasure problem, the <strong>Army</strong> decided in early<br />

1956 to develop the Mod I (Modification I) Lacrosse system using all-pulse ranging<br />

and tracking techniques. This effort was never completed because of meager<br />

funding and other difficulties. When the <strong>Army</strong> conducted a complete review of the<br />

program in 1959, the study showed that twelve Mod I Lacrosse battalions would<br />

32 Circular error probable (CEP) is an indicator of the accuracy of a missile or projectile, used as<br />

a factor in determining probable damage to a target. It is the radius of a circle within which half of<br />

the missiles/projectiles are expected to fall.<br />

33 Cagle, “<strong>History</strong> of the Lacrosse,” pp. 2–3, AMCOM files and copy in CMH files.<br />

34 Ibid., pp. 16–17, AMCOM files and copy in CMH files.<br />

35 Ibid., p. 19, AMCOM files and copy in CMH files.<br />

36 Ibid., pp. 46–50, 199–211, 213–29, AMCOM files and copy in CMH files.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!