04.06.2013 Views

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

Field ArTillery - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

mOdernizaTiOn effOrTs<br />

289<br />

a turret providing all-around traverse, and aluminum armor to protect the crew. 10<br />

Improvements on the 155-mm. howitzer continued and later included an on-board<br />

fire control system, navigation system, additional ballistic protection, a new cannon<br />

and mount, and secure communications. The upgraded 155-mm. M109A6 howitzer,<br />

known as Paladin, which began fielding in the early 1990s, weighed 32 tons, had<br />

a cruising range of 186 miles (299.3 kilometers), and fired at a maximum range of<br />

30 kilometers (18.6 miles). 11<br />

The towed 155-mm. howitzer in use in the 1970s was the M114A1, first fielded<br />

in 1942, having a range of 9 miles (14.6 kilometers). Under devel op ment in the<br />

United States since 1968, the M198 towed 155-mm. howitzer, which replaced the<br />

older weapon, had a lower rate of fire; was two tons lighter, making helo-transport<br />

easier; and had the new feature of an all-around traverse. Range varied, increasing<br />

from 18.1 kilometers (11.2 miles) to 22.6 kilometers (14 miles) with improved<br />

conventional munitions and climbing to more than 30 kilometers (18.6 miles)<br />

with rocket-assisted projectiles. The first M198 howitzers were ordered in 1977,<br />

but produc tion was delayed for a year pend ing studies on requirements for towed<br />

weapons in nondivi sional artillery units. In May 1980, <strong>Army</strong> Chief of Staff General<br />

Edward C. Meyer directed that the new light infantry divisions would use the M198<br />

as their direct-sup port weapon based on its munitions and range versatility, even<br />

though it proved more expensive and less mobile than the 105 model. 12 When the<br />

units were organized in the 1980s, however, they were not equipped with suitable<br />

prime movers for the M198s, which were still too heavy for many helicopters. The<br />

<strong>Army</strong> then decided to have a new 155-mm. weapons system designed that would<br />

weigh con sid erably less yet have the neces sary stability, and the light divisions<br />

returned to using 105-mm. howitzers for direct support. 13<br />

In 1978, the <strong>Army</strong> began replacing existing 8-inch howitzers and 175-mm. guns<br />

with a new 8-inch model. The new howitzer had a maximum range of nearly 40 kilometers<br />

(24.8 miles) with rocket-assisted pro jec tiles and 35 kilometers (21.8 miles)<br />

10 “The M109 Medium Howitzer,” International Defense Review, no. 1/1968, pp. 48–49; “U.S.<br />

<strong>Army</strong> Weaponry and Equipment in Mid-1980s,” <strong>Army</strong>, October 1985, pp. 405–06; “The Journal Interviews<br />

. . . BG A. Bar-David,” <strong>Field</strong> Artillery Journal, May-June 1978, pp. 15–17, in which the Israeli<br />

artillery chief stated that the first combat use of the M109A1 was in the Golan Heights in early 1974<br />

and that the weapon proved to be excellent. The M109 series was authorized a nine-man crew.<br />

11 Because the M109A6 howitzer was to be an interim weapon, development began on a new<br />

155-mm. self-propelled howitzer (XM2001), named Crusader, which was to be fully digitized and<br />

include a resupply vehicle. Ammunition handling, transfer, and loading were to be fully automated. It<br />

was also to have a 25-percent increase in range from the older models. See Donald L. Barnett, “Crusader,”<br />

<strong>Field</strong> Artillery, November-December 1999, pp. 14–18; Charles J. Emerson, Jr., “Crusader,”<br />

ibid., March-April 2002, pp. 42–45.<br />

12 “<strong>Army</strong> Weaponry,” p. 406, 407; William Whelihan, “The M198,” <strong>Field</strong> Artil lery Journal,<br />

January-February 1978, p. 9; idem, “We’ve Got 30!” ibid., May-June 1979, pp. 9–12; “M198 Under<br />

Heavy <strong>Field</strong> Test,” ibid., January-February 1979, p. 33; Walter B. Brown II, “The M198,” ibid., July-<br />

August 1982, pp. 26–29; “New Howit zers Delivered,” <strong>Army</strong> Logis tician, November-December 1978,<br />

p. 41; R. B. Pengelley, “The U.S. <strong>Army</strong>’s M198 Towed 155mm Howit zer,” International Defense<br />

Review, no. 7/1979, pp. 1163–68.<br />

13 Suzann W. Voigt, “Much Ado About Something,” <strong>Field</strong> Artillery Journal, July-August 1986,<br />

pp. 28–30.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!