Download Pdf - Ministry of Education and Sports

(b) Sector Performance Indicator
Performance Performance Indicator Source of
Issue
Verificatio
n
Inequitable Pupil to teacher ratio (PTR) in MoPS
teacher Government Schools 7
Teacher’s
deployment (P1 to P3)
Payroll
across (P4 To P7)
Report
districts and
June 2012/
within Prior Actions
EMIS
districts and a) New teacher deployment and Results
schools
rationalization policies for 2012
districts and schools
implemented (Phase 2).
High teacher
absenteeism
% of programmed education
sector wage bill effectively used
Prior Actions
a) Recruit 3000 teachers net of
deletion off the payroll
The difference between the
average of the 10 highest PTR’s
per district and the national
average
Prior Actions
a) Implement the education specific
component of the HTS­HTR
policy and tracking system. 8
BUDGET
REPORT
June 2012
Preliminar
y Report
EMIS 2012
JAF 3
JAF 4
Final Evaluation
Target Performance Target Status Rating
All: 57:1 54:1 56:1 53:1
Met
P.1­P.3: 68:1 68:1 66:1 66:1
Met
P.4­P.7: 50:1 43:1 52:1 44:1
Met
98% 108.4% >98% 95% Not
Met
33 26 23 25 Not
Met
Explanatory Notes
158
i) During the second phase of implementation
of the new teacher deployment formulae, the
education and Sports Sector raised the
primary school teacher ceiling to 139,699
and at least a teacher has been allocated per
class in all schools regardless of the highest
grade.
i) As at 30th June 2012, a total of 132,890
teachers were on payroll of which 57,807
and 75,083 teachers were allocated to lower
and upper primary respectively.
ii)Given that the current total enrolment in all
government schools is at 7,101,937 (3,804,973
for lower primary; 3,296,964 for upper primary),
this translates into a pupil teacher ratio of
53:1 (66:1 lower primary; 44:1 upper primary).
i) For FY 2011/12 a total of UGx. 526.3bn
was provided for Primary Teacher’s wage
of which a total of UGx. 499.16bn was
utilized as at 30 th June 2012. This translates
into a wage budget utilization rate of 95%.
ii) A total of 3,196 teachers were recruited (net
of deletion off the payroll), during FY 2011/12.
The districts with the highest PTR’s in FY
2011/2012 included; Bukwo, Apac, Lamwo,
Kumi, Kaberamaido, Bukedea, Agago,
Butaleja, Napak and Arua. The difference
between these district’s PTR average (i.e. 78:1)
and the national average (i.e. 53:1) is 25.
% of teachers at task in the 12 QEI 2012 63% 60% 68% ………… Not A contract was awarded to Business Synergies
worse off districts (QEI) 910
4 The baseline indicates a PTR of 53:1 which will also be the national target up to 2011/12. However, to enable tracking of equitable spread between the lower (P1­P3) and upper
primary levels (P4­P7), the indicator will be decomposed as follows from FY 2009/10: PTR for lower primary (P1­P3) and PTR for upper primary (P4­P7).
8 In essence the responsibility of MoPS. The technical annex JAF 4 will define who is responsible for what.
9 Teacher’s time at task is measured by teacher presence against the school time table; and head teacher presence at school.
ESSAPR FY 2011/12 to inform the 19 th ESSR – OCTOBER 2012