02.12.2012 Views

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Processing and Bioavailability (WG2) page 8<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

The activity of the WG 2 - Subgroup Processing<br />

Analysis of scientific literature on the matter<br />

The aim of Working Group 2 of the Concerted Action was to examine the scientific<br />

literature regarding the lycopene content of tomato products, lycopene degradation during<br />

processing and lycopene bioavailability for humans; a critical examination of what is reported<br />

in the scientific literature on the matter has been carried out.<br />

We thought to use a critical analysis of the literature collected, similar to the one used in<br />

HACCP. In other words, to analyse those factors which may give rise to lycopene<br />

modification during the stages from harvesting to consumption, in terms both of degradation<br />

and/or loss, and of other modifications (in particular isomerisations) which may influence its<br />

reactivity and bio-availability.<br />

In this way, the various factors analysed are viewed as possible causes of degradation,<br />

loss or isomerisation; an evaluation is obtained of the potential effect of the preventive<br />

measures already in use to optimise the technological processes, and of further corrective<br />

measures to adopt for the assignation to tomato products of a new role, that of a "nutraceutical<br />

food".<br />

The HACCP Plan can be summarized as follows:<br />

1. Develop and describe the whole flow sheet of the process<br />

2. Describe the product<br />

3. Prepare a list of steps where significant hazards occur<br />

4. Describe the preventive measures<br />

5. Identify the CCPs<br />

6. Establish critical limits for preventive measures with each identified CCP<br />

7. Establish CCP monitoring requirements<br />

8. Establish procedures for using the results of monitoring to adjust the process<br />

9. Establish corrective actions to be taken<br />

10. Establish procedures for verification that the system is working correctly.<br />

Obviously, since we did not analyse a process and did not have the aims of the HACCP (which are<br />

fundamentally those of hygiene and health), in our case the system was considerably simplified:<br />

1. Develop Flow Diagram<br />

Describe the whole chain from field to the consumer table<br />

2. Hazard Analysis<br />

Prepare a list of steps where significant lycopene modification hazards occur<br />

Describe the preventive measures normally used, when they may have an effect on lycopene content<br />

Identification of the Relevant Control Points for lycopene content reduction.<br />

Instead of HACCP, we introduced the HA-RCPL Hazard Analysis - Relevant Control<br />

Point for Lycopene content reduction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!