02.12.2012 Views

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Processing and Bioavailability (WG2) page 22<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

According to Rao and Agarwal ((1999), lycopene contents in canned tomato juice stored<br />

at room temperature for 2 months did not change significantly. At 3 different storage<br />

temperatures (4, 25 and 37 °C), lycopene levels did not change after 1 month of storage<br />

Sharma and Le Maguer (1996a) studied the kinetics of lycopene degradation during the<br />

storage of tomato pulp solids. Samples of fibre-rich tomato pulp, obtained by decanter<br />

centrifugation, were stored under different conditions (vacuum and dark, dark and air, and air<br />

and light) at –20°, +5° and + 25°C for 60 days. Lycopene loss was maximum (77.6%) at 25°C<br />

in the presence of air and light. Lycopene degradation followed a pseudo-first-order kinetics.<br />

The apparent reaction rate constant increased with the increase in storage temperature from<br />

20° to 25°C under different storage conditions, and were the lowest under vacuum and dark,<br />

confirming the potential detrimental effect of oxygen and light on lycopene loss. The authors<br />

calculated the activation energy (Ea) values for lycopene degradation under the three different<br />

storage conditions, finding non-statistically different Ea values ranging from 20 to 28'kJ/mol.<br />

Freeze-drying and oven drying (25, 50 and 75'°C) of fibre-rich tomato pulp did not cause any<br />

loss in lycopene content. However, after storage of dried samples at room temperature in the<br />

dark, lycopene loss reached 97% in freeze-dried samples and 73-79% in oven-dried ones.<br />

Although the moisture content of the differently dehydrated samples was not reported, it can<br />

be assumed that freeze-dried samples were more readily oxidised because of the higher<br />

surface exposure to oxygen and the lower moisture content.<br />

Tamburini et al. (1998) found that the hot-break juice extraction technique lowers, but<br />

less than 2%, the initial lycopene content because of the severe heat effect, although allowing<br />

the tomato cell structure to remain almost unchanged preserves lycopene more efficiently<br />

over time against the reactions that cause its destruction; in contrast, with other juice<br />

extraction techniques (cold-break); owing to the lack of this protective effect on account of<br />

the triggering of pectolytic reactions, an 8-15% decrease in lycopene content already occurs<br />

after 4-6 months of storage.<br />

A thesis study by Zanotti (1999) reveals that although lycopene remains substantially<br />

unaltered in time, even under rather drastic storage conditions, a marked degradation of colour<br />

occurs (see Fig. 3)<br />

Time Lycopene ± std dev.. Lycopene ± .std dev.<br />

(days) (ppm at 9°Bx) (mg/Kg of d.w.)<br />

0 187.4 ab ±9.3 2082 ab ±103<br />

30 183.8 b ±10.4 2042 b ±115<br />

90 178.5 c ±15.3 1983 c ±170<br />

165 180.5 c ±9.9 2006 c ±110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!