02.12.2012 Views

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Observational epidemiological surveys (WG 3) page 15<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Table: 7 Level of evidence of protection provided by studies on vitamin E<br />

and cancers<br />

cancer sites CNERNA<br />

World Cancer Res COMA Food and Nutrition<br />

(France, 1996) Fund (USA, 1997) Policy (UK, 1998)<br />

mouth and pharynx insufficient insufficient no data reported<br />

larynx no data reported no data reported no data reported<br />

oesophagus insufficient insufficient moderately consistent<br />

lung and respiratory<br />

tract<br />

moderately consistent possible insufficient<br />

stomach insufficient no relationship inconsistent<br />

colon-rectum insufficient insufficient inconsistent<br />

pancreas insufficient insufficient insufficient<br />

liver no data reported no data reported ND<br />

breast inconsistent no relationship insufficient<br />

ovary no data reported no data reported no data reported<br />

endometrium no data reported no data reported no data reported<br />

cervix insufficient possible moderately consistent but<br />

limited<br />

prostate no data reported insufficient inconsistent<br />

kidney ND no data reported ND<br />

bladder ND insufficient insufficient<br />

thyroid<br />

ND: Not Done<br />

ND no data reported ND<br />

Comments on table 7<br />

None of the reference books had data on larynx, liver, ovary, endometrium, kidney and<br />

thyroid cancers. They agreed that data are insufficient for mouth and pharynx, oesophagus,<br />

colon, rectum, pancreas and prostate cancers. For stomach and breast cancers, the<br />

prevalent opinion is that there is no relationship. The only possible reduction of risk provided<br />

by vitamin E could be for lung and respiratory tract cancers (COMA said it was insufficient<br />

because they took into account intervention trials), and for cervix cancers, although data were<br />

limited.<br />

Comparison between tables 2 and 7<br />

There was little overlapping between Table 2 and Table 7, the only exception being the<br />

possible effect of vitamin E on lung and respiratory tract cancers. This discrepancy is largely<br />

explained by the food source of vitamin E which was mainly seed oils and not fruit and<br />

vegetables.<br />

1.1.7 Concluding Statements<br />

• Tomatoes:<br />

⇒ convincing for oesophagus, stomach and lung cancers; possible for mouth<br />

and pharynx cancers. For most of the other cancers, the results were

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!