02.12.2012 Views

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mechanisms and Biomarkers (WG 4) page 35<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

oligonucleotides and bases respectively. Bases are excreted directly into the urine whereas the<br />

oligonucleotides are further hydrolysed to nucleosides before excretion into the urine. The<br />

presence of background levels of a wide variety of oxidised nucleosides in urine indicates that<br />

DNA oxidation by RS is occurring constantly under non-pathological conditions. In principle<br />

the best analytical approach would be to measure a wide range of DNA base damage products<br />

by mass spectrometry to obtain a comprehensive and rigorous identification of the products.<br />

However, a major problem with the use of GC-MS is the formation of artefacts by the acidic<br />

hydrolysis and derivatisation procedures required by the conventional process (Dizdaroglu,<br />

1998). An obvious choice for non-destructive analysis of products would be LC-MS, but this<br />

technique is still in the development phase for DNA oxidation products. Since the<br />

development of a simple electrochemical detection method linked to HPLC (Floyd et al.,<br />

1986) urinary 8OHdG has become the most widely analysed chemical biomarker for<br />

oxidative DNA damage, reviewed in Loft et al. (1998). Limitations of the use of 8OHdG are:<br />

1. It is not a quantitative marker for the oxidative damage to DNA.<br />

2. It is only a minor product of the attack on DNA by reactive nitrogen and chlorine species.<br />

3. The redox state of the cell will effect the ratio of 8OHdG to FAPyG, as will the presence of<br />

transition metals (Dizdaroglu, 1998). Theoretically one can measure a wide range of base<br />

damage products by mass spectrometry, this would also measure the attack on DNA by<br />

reactive nitrogen and chlorine species and would enable a rigorous identification of products,<br />

since techniques to overcome the problems of artifactual hydrolysis and derivatisation for<br />

GC-MS have recently been overcome.<br />

Biological markers of DNA damage and cancer development<br />

The current most important barrier to progress in the search for cancer biomarkers is the lack<br />

of intermediate biomarkers for the major cancers of the lung, breast and pancreas. Significant<br />

intermediate biomarkers of full-blown oral and cervical cancers have been identified as the<br />

hyperplastic or dysplastic lesions of oral leukoplakia and cervical dysplasia, which identify<br />

individuals at high risk for development of these diseases. Fortunately these conditions are<br />

reversible by appropriate interventions.<br />

Membrane Damage: a prelude to DNA damage<br />

LDH release is a marker for gross membrane damage resulting in a loss of membrane<br />

integrity, it is suggested that over 10% LDH release leads to irreversible changes and cell<br />

death (Miyashita et al., 1997). Trypan blue uptake is a measure of membrane

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!