02.12.2012 Views

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Processing and Bioavailability (WG2) page 41<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Other aspects<br />

At this point, in order to provide a more detailed view various topics must be addressed<br />

which are of importance for quality (ratio between lycopene content and colour of tomato<br />

conserves) and for the tomato/health aspect, which is the specific aim of this CA.<br />

1. Lycopene and colour<br />

Various studies have been carried out on the relationship between chemical-physical and<br />

sensory parameters of processed tomato, and several methods have been set up to evaluate the<br />

quality of products. Despite this, data on the relationship between lycopene content and<br />

sensory attributes, in particular colour, are poor, although this relationship may be useful to<br />

select products and to set up rapid methods of measuring the lycopene content in raw and<br />

processed tomatoes.<br />

Since lycopene is responsible for the red colour of tomatoes (95% of the carotenoids in the<br />

ripe fruit), it might seem natural, at first sight, to presume that a correlation exists between<br />

lycopene content and the colour of the tomato and its products; colour is normally measured<br />

by means of reflectance with tristimulus colorimeters (Gardner, Hunterlab, Minolta) which<br />

provide measurements with three parameters: L (visual lightness), a (red colour) and b<br />

(yellow colour) and combinations of these (a/b, L*b/a, (∆L 2 + ∆a 2 + ∆b 2 ) 1/2 with respect to a<br />

reference value, etc). In effect, this does not occur (Koskitalo, Zanotti), the attempts made<br />

yielding correlation coefficients lower than 70%. This is probably because the comparison<br />

made is between an objective measurement (absolute lycopene content) and an "artificial"<br />

instrumental one. Furthermore, an analytical measurement of lycopene yields the value of all<br />

the lycopene present, and not that which is responsible for the colour of the tomato or tomato<br />

product, on account of its physical state (solid coagula, of varying dimensions depending on<br />

the degree of crushing, in a liquid matrix). Stated in simple terms, the same red colour may be<br />

produced by a cumulus of small red granules, either empty or full of pigment.<br />

The same problem occurs with tomato powders, in which the same powder reduced to a<br />

different physical state (granulometry) yields, even to the naked eye, completely discordant<br />

results, despite starting from the same product and hence the same lycopene content.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!