02.12.2012 Views

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Observational epidemiological surveys (WG 3) page 45<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Comments on the results of the intervention trials<br />

With the exception of a protective effect of β-carotene at 15mg in combination with vitamin E<br />

at 30mg and Se at 50µg against gastric cancer in the main Linxian trial, which was borderline<br />

significance and not confirmed in the ATBC study, none of the studies provided evidence of a<br />

protective effect of β-carotene, alone or in combination with vitamin E or retinol. This is also<br />

true for studies on colorectal polyps and adenomas. However, the overall mortality, cancer<br />

mortality (SCPS) and lung cancer incidence (ATBC, CARET) was lower in people with<br />

higher baseline β-carotene plasma concentrations in agreement with the results of the<br />

observational studies.<br />

How to explain this failure? With regard to the absence of effect, an easy explanation might<br />

be that β-carotene is the marker of other(s) beneficial compounds found in fruit and<br />

vegetables together with β-carotene. However this is not sufficient to understand the observed<br />

increase in risk. It is worthwhile to underline that this adverse effect occured in subjects at<br />

risk (tobacco use, asbestos exposure, colo-rectal adenomas, etc.). Therefore, β-carotene might<br />

interfere with carcinogenicity at a stage where antioxidant properties might enhance cell<br />

proliferation (Gerber, 1996). β-carotene might act in some situations (high oxygen pressure,<br />

exposure to <strong>NO</strong>2) as pro-oxidant, capable of damaging DNA or to act on cell signal<br />

transduction at the promotion phase (Carotenoids, IARC, 1998). This would explain the<br />

increase in risk in smokers (ATBC, CARET), and the absence of effects in cohorts with few<br />

smokers (The Physician Health’study and the Women Health’study). Other explanations<br />

include the very high dosage used and the possible necessity to combine several protective<br />

micro-compounds.<br />

Vitamin E significantly lowered the prostate cancer mortality by 41%, and the incidence of<br />

advanced tumors by 40% (Heinonen et al., 1998). It was without effect on latent cancer, and<br />

on the time-lag between diagnosis and death. There was no relationship between prostate<br />

cancer incidence and mortality with vitamin E intake and plasma levels at baseline. Indeed,<br />

this result has to be confirmed but, the results of the studies reported by Eichholzer et al.<br />

(1996) and Gann et al., (1999) are in line with these results although they were only<br />

significant in the smoker groups (Table 25).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!