02.12.2012 Views

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Observational epidemiological surveys (WG 3) page 8<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

oesophagus NM convincing<br />

stomach NM convincing<br />

rectum NM inconsistent<br />

pancreas NM insufficient<br />

breast NM insufficient<br />

endometrium NM insufficient<br />

cervix NM insufficient<br />

prostate insufficient insufficient<br />

NM: not mentioned<br />

1-1-2 Other fruit and vegetables (Table 2)<br />

We report below the summary of the three reference books with regard to « fruit and<br />

vegetables » because tomatoes are most often included in this foods group.<br />

Comments on table 2<br />

The level of agreement among the reference books was generally good:<br />

perfect(3/3 or 2/2) : • For oesophagus and pancreas cancers for which a high intake of fruit<br />

and vegetables is recommended. For cervix and bladder cancers, results are also consistent<br />

but the data are limited.<br />

moderate (2/3): • For the tobacco-related cancers, mouth and pharynx, larynx, lung<br />

and respiratory tract, the disagreement comes from COMA. The members of this group<br />

noted that the alteration of the diet might be tobacco-induced, and hence, that tobacco could<br />

be the only cause for these cancers.<br />

• For stomach cancers the disagreement comes from COMA, because<br />

only half of the cohort showed a decreased risk which was due to a potential confounding<br />

factor: helicobacter pylori.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!