02.12.2012 Views

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

NO - Besoin d'assistance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mechanisms and Biomarkers (WG 4) page 34<br />

__________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

PUFAs in animal and human cell membranes, making ethane and pentane the biomarkers of<br />

choice for measuring membrane lipid peroxidation. Numerous studies have been carried out<br />

which demonstrated increased alkane exhalation as a result of diseases or disorders which<br />

have oxidative stress in their aetiologies, and correlate with many dietary factors and<br />

toxicological agents (de Zwart et al., 1999). Although this technique has been widely used<br />

over the last decade, there are practical limitations to the methods used. There are significant<br />

background levels of both pentane and isoprene in human breath. Pentane is accepted as a<br />

measure of lipid peroxidation but the background source of isoprene is, as yet, unknown.<br />

Also, because of the similar boiling points the 2 compounds are very difficult to separate<br />

(Springfield and Levitt, 1994). However, a new GC method has been developed which can<br />

resolve pentane and isoprene (Mendis et al., 1994). It is tempting to speculate on the origin of<br />

isoprene and this author would like to suggest that dietary carotenoids might be the source<br />

following radical attack and cleavage. If this were to be the case then we have a valuable new<br />

biomarker with which to follow the fate of plasma/tissue carotenoids in response to oxidative<br />

stress.<br />

Biomarker of Oxidative of DNA Damage<br />

Can we use variation in the steady-state levels of DNA damage as an intermediate measure of<br />

potential cancer risk?<br />

RS can attack most biological molecules, but with respect to cancer and ageing DNA is<br />

proposed as the major target in the absence of adequate data on the oxidative damage to<br />

proteins, which may, in the future be found to have a significant role in controlling the fidelity<br />

of polymerases, repair enzymes and gene expression (Dean, 1998).<br />

Several reactive oxygen species can attack DNA directly to create mutagenic oxidation<br />

products (Halliwell, 1998). This may contribute significantly to age related development of<br />

cancer, therefore, a decrease in such damage should decrease the risk of cancer development.<br />

A note of caution, when considering mechanisms of protection is that one must consider that<br />

an agent decreasing steady state levels of oxidative DNA damage in vivo may do so either by<br />

decreasing the rate of oxidative DNA damage and/or by increasing the rates of repair of such<br />

damage (Halliwell, 1999).<br />

RS can cause the formation of DNA-protein crosslinks, damage to the sugar phosphate<br />

backbone and many specific chemical modifications of the purine and pyrimidine bases.<br />

Oxidative base modification can cause mutations, whereas oxidation of the sugar moieties<br />

induces base release or DNA strand breaks which can be conveniently analysed in the Comet<br />

assay (see later). During the repair process endonucleases and glycosylases excise

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!