13.07.2015 Views

Water for people.pdf - WHO Thailand Digital Repository

Water for people.pdf - WHO Thailand Digital Repository

Water for people.pdf - WHO Thailand Digital Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 5 6 / M A N A G E M E N T C H A L L E N G E S : S T E W A R D S H I P A N D G O V E R N A N C EEnsuring the Knowledge Base: A Collective Responsibilitypractices. Development partners are increasingly stimulating growthin the local consultancy sector rather than turning to internationalexpertise. Patterns in the supply of bilateral support are alsobeginning to change, with the untying of development assistance. Asa result, national funds from a donor country are not necessarily tiedto technical assistance from the same country.As noted, the water industry relies on a very broad body ofknowledge to operate: codes of practice, operating and trainingmanuals <strong>for</strong> systems, plants and equipment, databases, governmentguidelines, research journals, reports of professional and tradeassociations, manufacturers and suppliers. Much of this operatingknowledge, however, still tends to be based on the needs ofadvanced countries. All too often, low-income countries adopt laws,regulations and working practices from advanced countries, when inmany cases they lack the capacity to en<strong>for</strong>ce and apply them. Whileseveral low-income countries have developed local expertise to dealwith challenges in their water sectors – examples include Mexicanwastewater and irrigation re<strong>for</strong>m practices and Brazilian expertise inwater and sanitation in poor communities – these experiences are notsystematically shared with other developing countries. Language,financial and cultural barriers impede the transfer of knowledge.Channels must be facilitated to boost this south-south collaborationand, in the process, place higher value on local expertise, which ismore inclined to view water knowledge in context.Overcoming poor data availabilityEmpowering stakeholders at all levels is one facet of creating asound knowledge base. Another vital facet is the production ofhigh-quality data. Agenda 21 warned that a lack of data is‘seriously impairing the capacities of countries to make in<strong>for</strong>meddecisions concerning environment and development’.National water databases are the backbone of international datamanagement. However, in many parts of the world hydrometric andwater quality monitoring networks are deficient. Table 14.1 showsthe regional variation in the total number and density of variousmonitoring stations. Data from many of the stations measuring riverdischarge are not available and only a relatively small number havedata series of sufficient length and quality <strong>for</strong> use in analyses.Similarly, there is a dearth of quality data on groundwater in spiteof its potential <strong>for</strong> future water supply. Studies have additionallyshown that the density of these stations is much lower in Africathan elsewhere.In addition to the problems in collecting data – often due to alack of resources <strong>for</strong> maintaining observation stations – the abilityto use available data to describe the status and trends of globalwater resources is hampered by divergent procedures <strong>for</strong> collectingdata, different quality assurance procedures and unreliabletelecommunications. The fragmentation of national organizationsdealing with water resources assessment has meant that networksTable 14.1. Increases and decreases in the number of hydrological observing stations in the world between 1974 and 1997World Meteorological Organization RegionsType of I II III IV V VI Totalstations Africa Asia South North and South-west Europe (global)America Central PacificAmericaMETEOROLOGICALPrecipitation 10,074 9,445 ++ 22,975 +++ 20,174 16,367 35,091 - 114,126 Evaporation (pans) 682 +++ 1,011 +++ 1,945 +++ 871 1,296 +++ 1,129 + 6,934 ++SURFACE WATERDischarge 1,748 +++ 3,163 ++ 7,568 +++ 11,958 - 5,935 + 18,796 ++ 49,168 +Stage 1,798 +++ 8,186 +++ 7,022 +++ 10,819 - 852 – 10,427 - 39,104 +Suspended solids 560 +++ 440 ++ 1,187 +++ 1,008 + 514 – 3,590 +++ 7,299 ++Bed load 6 +++ 27 ++ 339 +++ 0 n.a. 0 — 1,423 +++ 1,795 +++<strong>Water</strong> quality 310 - 2,057 ++ 3,076 +++ 14,218 +++ 1,415 — 14,974 +++ 36,050 +++GROUNDWATERGroundwater level 1,450 ++ 3,776 1,133 +++ 4,344 ++ 1,999 +++ 45,782 – 58,484 -Key: — = < -2% – = < -1% - = < -0.5% = no significant change + = > +0.5% ++ = > +1% +++ = > +2% n.a. = data not availableThis table shows the regional variation in the total number and density of various monitoring stations. Data from many of the stations measuring river discharge are not available and only arelatively small number have data series of sufficient length and quality <strong>for</strong> use in analyses.Source: WMO, the World’s Hydrological Networks, 1997.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!