19.08.2015 Views

Honouring the Truth Reconciling for the Future

1IZC4AF

1IZC4AF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The challenge of reconciliation • 249states and is independent of <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>the</strong> document has hadno value <strong>for</strong> centuries. The refutation of this doctrine is <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e now under <strong>the</strong>competence of national authorities, legislators, lawyers and legal historians. 21For many, that Catholic statement was inadequate. The doctrine’s influence inWestern law and its destructive consequences <strong>for</strong> Indigenous peoples have been welldocumented by scholars and o<strong>the</strong>r experts. 22In 2014, <strong>the</strong> North American representative to <strong>the</strong> un Permanent Forum onIndigenous Issues, Grand Chief Edward John, tabled <strong>the</strong> “Study on <strong>the</strong> Impacts of <strong>the</strong>Doctrine of Discovery on Indigenous Peoples, Including Mechanisms, Processes, andInstruments of Redress.” The study concluded:With regard to land dispossessions, <strong>for</strong>ced conversions of non-Christians, <strong>the</strong>deprivation of liberty and <strong>the</strong> enslavement of indigenous peoples, <strong>the</strong> Holy Seereported that an “abrogation process took place over <strong>the</strong> centuries” to invalidatesuch nefarious actions. Such papal renunciations do not go far enough. Thereis a pressing need to decolonize from <strong>the</strong> debilitating impacts and ongoinglegacy of denial by states of indigenous peoples’ inherent sovereignty, laws, andtitle to <strong>the</strong> lands, territories, and resources. At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong>re is a growingmovement among faith-based bodies to repudiate <strong>the</strong> doctrine of discovery. 23In 2010, <strong>the</strong> Anglican Church of Canada was <strong>the</strong> first of <strong>the</strong> Settlement Agreementchurches in Canada to reject <strong>the</strong> Doctrine of Discovery and to ”review <strong>the</strong> Church’spolicies and programs with a view to exposing <strong>the</strong> historical reality and impact of <strong>the</strong>Doctrine of Discovery and eliminating its presence in its contemporary policies, program,and structures.” 24 In 2013, <strong>the</strong> Anglican Church established a Commission onDiscovery, Reconciliation, and Justice, which had three goals:1) to examine <strong>the</strong> Anglican Church of Canada’s policies and practices andrevise <strong>the</strong>m as necessary to be consistent with its repudiation of <strong>the</strong> Doctrineof Discovery;2) to look into <strong>the</strong> question of “what is reconciliation”; and3) to review <strong>the</strong> church’s commitment to addressing long-standing injusticesborne by Indigenous peoples in Canada.The Commission on Discovery will table a final report to <strong>the</strong> Anglican GeneralSynod in 2016. 25In February 2012, <strong>the</strong> Executive Committee of <strong>the</strong> World Council of Churches(wcc) also repudiated <strong>the</strong> Doctrine of Discovery. The wcc represents over 500 millionChristians, in more than 110 countries, in 345 member churches, includingthree of <strong>the</strong> Settlement Agreement churches. 26 The wcc statement denounced <strong>the</strong>Doctrine of Discovery and urged governments to “dismantle <strong>the</strong> legal structures andpolicies based on <strong>the</strong> Doctrine of Discovery … [and to] ensure that <strong>the</strong>y con<strong>for</strong>m to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!