19.08.2015 Views

Honouring the Truth Reconciling for the Future

1IZC4AF

1IZC4AF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

270 • <strong>Truth</strong> & Reconciliation Commission<strong>the</strong> federal Department of Justice has two important, and potentially conflicting, roleswhen it comes to Aboriginal peoples:1) The Department of Justice Canada provides legal opinions to <strong>the</strong> Departmentof Aboriginal Affairs and Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Development Canada (aandc) to guide <strong>the</strong>department in its policy development, legislative initiatives, and actions. Thoseopinions, and <strong>the</strong> actions based on <strong>the</strong>m, invariably affect Aboriginal governmentsand <strong>the</strong> lives of Aboriginal people significantly. Often, those opinionsare about <strong>the</strong> scope and extent of Aboriginal and Treaty rights, and often <strong>the</strong>y<strong>for</strong>m <strong>the</strong> basis upon which federal Aboriginal policy is developed and enacted.2) Justice Canada also acts as <strong>the</strong> legal advocate <strong>for</strong> aandc and <strong>the</strong> governmentin legal disputes between <strong>the</strong> government and Aboriginal people. In thatcapacity, it takes instruction from senior officials within <strong>the</strong> Department ofAboriginal Affairs when <strong>the</strong> department is implicated in legal actions concerningits responsibilities. It gives advice about <strong>the</strong> conduct of litigation, <strong>the</strong> legalposition to be advanced, <strong>the</strong> implementation of legal strategy, and <strong>the</strong> decisionwhe<strong>the</strong>r to appeal a particular court ruling.Upholding <strong>the</strong> honour of <strong>the</strong> Crown, and disputing a legal challenge to an official’sor department’s action or decision, can sometimes give rise to conflictinglegal obligations.In <strong>the</strong> Commission’s view, those legal opinions should be available, as of right andupon request, to Aboriginal peoples, <strong>for</strong> whom <strong>the</strong> Crown is a fiduciary. Canadiangovernments and <strong>the</strong>ir law departments have a responsibility to discontinue actingas though <strong>the</strong>y are in an adversarial relationship with Aboriginal peoples and to startacting as true fiduciaries. Canada’s Department of Justice must be more transparentand accountable to Aboriginal peoples; this includes sharing <strong>the</strong>ir legal opinions onAboriginal rights. As noted above, <strong>the</strong>re is precedent <strong>for</strong> making this change. Not onlyhas <strong>the</strong> United States Department of <strong>the</strong> Interior’s Office of <strong>the</strong> Solicitor made publicits legal opinions on a range of issues affecting Native Americans, but also <strong>the</strong>se arenow widely available online. 63Call to Action51) We call upon <strong>the</strong> Government of Canada, as an obligation of its fiduciary responsibility,to develop a policy of transparency by publishing legal opinions it developsand upon which it acts or intends to act, in regard to <strong>the</strong> scope and extent ofAboriginal and Treaty rights.One of <strong>the</strong> aspects of <strong>the</strong> Doctrine of Discovery that continues to assert itself tothis day is <strong>the</strong> fact that court cases involving Aboriginal territorial claims have placeda heavy onus on Aboriginal claimants to prove that <strong>the</strong>y were in occupation of land

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!