19.08.2015 Views

Honouring the Truth Reconciling for the Future

1IZC4AF

1IZC4AF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

304 • <strong>Truth</strong> & Reconciliation Commissionf) Returning human remains to <strong>the</strong> family, community or nation of origin, onrequest, or consulting with Aboriginal advisers on appropriate disposition,where remains cannot be associated with a particular nation;g) Ensuring that Aboriginal people and communities have effective access tocultural education and training opportunities available through museums andcultural institutions. [Recommendation 3.6.4] 135In <strong>the</strong> years following <strong>the</strong> Royal Commission’s report, museums across <strong>the</strong> countryhave implemented many of its recommendations. 136 Many have worked with communitiesto repatriate human remains or cultural artifacts. For some institutions, consultationand collaborative partnerships with Aboriginal communities have becomestandard practice, and Aboriginal internships and o<strong>the</strong>r training opportunities havebeen established. Yet, more is still needed, even as museums are faced with significantchallenges in obtaining adequate and stable multi-year funding to properly support<strong>the</strong>se critical initiatives. 137Over <strong>the</strong> past three decades, Canadian museums that used to tell <strong>the</strong> story of <strong>the</strong>nation’s past with little regard <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> histories of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoplesare slowly trans<strong>for</strong>ming. Although dialogue between museums and Aboriginalpeoples has improved substantially since <strong>the</strong> 1980s, <strong>the</strong> broader debate continuesover whose history is told and how it is interpreted. Here, we focus on two nationalmuseums, <strong>the</strong> Canadian Museum of History (<strong>for</strong>merly <strong>the</strong> Canadian Museum ofCivilization) 138 and <strong>the</strong> Canadian Museum <strong>for</strong> Human Rights. As national public historyinstitutions, <strong>the</strong>y bear a particular responsibility to retell <strong>the</strong> story of Canada’s pastso that it reflects not only diverse cultures, history, and experiences of First Nations,Inuit, and Métis peoples, but also <strong>the</strong> collective violence and historical injustices that<strong>the</strong>y have suffered at <strong>the</strong> hands of <strong>the</strong> state. It is instructive to examine how <strong>the</strong>setwo public history institutions plan to interpret <strong>the</strong> history of Aboriginal peoples andaddress historical injustices in <strong>the</strong> coming years.Canadian Museum of HistoryAppearing be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> House of Commons Standing Committee on CanadianHeritage in June 2013, Mark O’Neill, president and chief executive officer of <strong>the</strong>Canadian Museum of Civilization Corporation, acknowledged that many importantaspects and milestones of Canadian history—including residential schools—havebeen missing from <strong>the</strong> museum.[P]erhaps <strong>the</strong> most egregious flaw in <strong>the</strong> Canada Hall is its starting point. Ifyou’ve been <strong>the</strong>re, you will know that its telling of our national story begins notwith <strong>the</strong> arrival of First Peoples but with <strong>the</strong> arrival of Europeans in <strong>the</strong> eleventh

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!