19.08.2015 Views

Honouring the Truth Reconciling for the Future

1IZC4AF

1IZC4AF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The challenge of reconciliation • 265Although societal empathy <strong>for</strong> Aboriginal victims of abuse in residential schools isimportant, this alone will not prevent similar acts of violence from recurring in newinstitutional <strong>for</strong>ms. There is a need <strong>for</strong> a clear and public recognition that Aboriginalpeoples must be seen and treated as much more than just <strong>the</strong> beneficiaries of publicgood will. As holders of Treaty, constitutional, and human rights, <strong>the</strong>y are entitled tojustice and accountability from Canada to ensure that <strong>the</strong>ir rights are not violated.In his initial report, tabled in August of 2012, Pablo de Greiff, <strong>the</strong> first un SpecialRapporteur on <strong>the</strong> Promotion of <strong>Truth</strong>, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-Recurrence, pointed out that in countries where prosecuting individual perpetratorsof criminal acts involving human rights violations has been difficult, o<strong>the</strong>r measuressuch as truth-seeking <strong>for</strong>ums, reparations, and institutional re<strong>for</strong>ms are especiallycritical. Such measures enable victims of state violence to develop some confidence in<strong>the</strong> legitimacy and credibility of <strong>the</strong> state’s justice system. But de Greiff cautions thatimplementing <strong>the</strong>se measures alone does not guarantee that reconciliation will follow.Apologies, commemoration, public memorials, and educational re<strong>for</strong>m are alsorequired in order to trans<strong>for</strong>m social attitudes and foster long-term reconciliation. 57The Treaty, constitutional, and human rights violations that occurred in andaround <strong>the</strong> residential school system confirm <strong>the</strong> dangers that exist <strong>for</strong> Aboriginalpeoples when <strong>the</strong>ir right to self-determination is ignored or limited by <strong>the</strong> state,which purports to act “in <strong>the</strong>ir best interests.” Historically, whenever Aboriginal peopleshave been targeted as a specific group that is deemed by government to be inneed of protective legislation and policies, <strong>the</strong> results have been culturally and ethnicallydestructive.For Aboriginal peoples in Canada, <strong>the</strong> protection and exercise of <strong>the</strong>ir right toself-determination is <strong>the</strong> strongest antidote to fur<strong>the</strong>r violation of <strong>the</strong>ir rights. In <strong>the</strong>coming years, governments must remain accountable <strong>for</strong> ensuring that Aboriginalpeoples’ rights are protected and that government actions do, in fact, repair trust andfoster reconciliation. Repairing trust begins with an apology, but it involves far morethan that.Moving from apology to actionFrom <strong>the</strong> outset, this Commission has emphasized that reconciliation is not a onetimeevent; it is a multi-generational journey that involves all Canadians. The publicapologies and compensation to residential school Survivors, <strong>the</strong>ir families, andcommunities by Canada and <strong>the</strong> churches that ran <strong>the</strong> residential schools marked<strong>the</strong> beginning, not <strong>the</strong> end, of this journey. Survivors needed to hear governmentand church officials admit that <strong>the</strong> cultural, spiritual, emotional, physical, and sexual

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!