19.08.2015 Views

Honouring the Truth Reconciling for the Future

1IZC4AF

1IZC4AF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

84 • <strong>Truth</strong> & Reconciliation Commissionschool lost a foot in 1944 after an accident during <strong>the</strong> operation of a machine used in<strong>the</strong> preparation of fodder. 257 Two boys from <strong>the</strong> Birtle, Manitoba, school were injuredin a truck accident in 1942. From Indian Affairs correspondence, it appears that <strong>the</strong>accident involved a truck carrying seventy boys who were being taken from <strong>the</strong> schoolto <strong>the</strong> fields to do farm work. Indian Affairs official R. A. Hoey criticized <strong>the</strong> principal<strong>for</strong> allowing <strong>the</strong> practice to take place, noting that “it is almost unbelievable that <strong>the</strong>principal should permit 70 pupils to be conveyed in a truck.” 258Even though <strong>the</strong> half-day system was supposedly eliminated in <strong>the</strong> early 1950s, studentscontinued to be overworked. 259 After Sam Ross ran away from <strong>the</strong> Birtle school in1959, he told Indian Affairs official J. R. Bell that he wanted to continue his education,but had been <strong>for</strong>ced to work “too hard” at <strong>the</strong> school. He said that from September toChristmas of <strong>the</strong> previous year, he had worked in <strong>the</strong> school barn every day between“6:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. and from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. again at recess, from 4:00 p.m. to6:00 p.m. and had had to stoke up <strong>the</strong> furnace with coal at 10:00 o’clock be<strong>for</strong>e retiring.”Ross said that “he liked school but not working like a hired hand.” Bell recommendedthat <strong>the</strong> amount of student labour being done at <strong>the</strong> Birtle school be investigated. 260Language and culture: “The Indian language isindeed seldom heard in <strong>the</strong> institution.”The government’s hostile approach to Aboriginal languages was reiterated innumerous policy directives. In 1883, Indian Commissioner Edgar Dewdney instructedBattle<strong>for</strong>d school principal Thomas Clarke that great attention was to be given “towardsimparting a knowledge of <strong>the</strong> art of reading, writing and speaking <strong>the</strong> English languagera<strong>the</strong>r than that of Cree.” 261 In 1889, Deputy Minister of Indian Affairs LawrenceVankoughnet in<strong>for</strong>med Bishop Paul Durieu that in <strong>the</strong> new Cranbrook, BritishColumbia, school, mealtime conversations were to be “conducted exclusively in <strong>the</strong>English language.” The principal was also to set a fixed time during which Aboriginallanguages could be spoken. 262 In 1890, Indian Commissioner Hayter Reed proposed,“At <strong>the</strong> most <strong>the</strong> native language is only to be used as a vehicle of teaching and shouldbe discontinued as such as soon as practicable.” English was to be <strong>the</strong> primary languageof instruction, “even where French is taught.” 263 The Indian Affairs “Programmeof Studies <strong>for</strong> Indian Schools” of 1893 advised, “Every ef<strong>for</strong>t must be made to inducepupils to speak English, and to teach <strong>the</strong>m to understand it; unless <strong>the</strong>y do <strong>the</strong> wholework of <strong>the</strong> teacher is likely to be wasted.” 264Principals regularly reported on <strong>the</strong>ir success in suppressing Aboriginal languages.In 1887, Principal E. Claude boasted that his thirty students at <strong>the</strong> High River school“all understand English passably well and few are unable to express <strong>the</strong>mselves inEnglish. They talk English in recreation. I scarcely need any coercive means to oblige

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!