19.08.2015 Views

Honouring the Truth Reconciling for the Future

1IZC4AF

1IZC4AF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

62 • <strong>Truth</strong> & Reconciliation CommissionIn justifying <strong>the</strong> investment in industrial schools to Parliament in 1883, PublicWorks Minister Hector Langevin argued thatif you wish to educate <strong>the</strong>se children you must separate <strong>the</strong>m from <strong>the</strong>ir parentsduring <strong>the</strong> time that <strong>the</strong>y are being educated. If you leave <strong>the</strong>m in <strong>the</strong> family<strong>the</strong>y may know how to read and write, but <strong>the</strong>y still remain savages, whereas byseparating <strong>the</strong>m in <strong>the</strong> way proposed, <strong>the</strong>y acquire <strong>the</strong> habits and tastes—it is tobe hoped only <strong>the</strong> good tastes—of civilized people. 116The federal government entered into residential schooling at a time when it wascolonizing Aboriginal lands in western Canada. It recognized that, through <strong>the</strong>Treaties, it had made commitments to provide Aboriginal people with relief in periodsof economic distress. It also feared that as traditional Aboriginal economic pursuitswere marginalized or eliminated by settlers, <strong>the</strong> government might be called uponto provide increased relief. In this context, <strong>the</strong> federal government chose to investin residential schooling <strong>for</strong> a number of reasons. First, it would provide Aboriginalpeople with skills that would allow <strong>the</strong>m to participate in <strong>the</strong> coming market-basedeconomy. Second, it would fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>ir political assimilation. It was hoped that studentswho were educated in residential schools would give up <strong>the</strong>ir status and notreturn to <strong>the</strong>ir reserve communities and families. Third, <strong>the</strong> schools were seen asengines of cultural and spiritual change: ‘savages’ were to emerge as Christian ‘whitemen.’ There was also a national security element to <strong>the</strong> schools. Indian Affairs officialAndsell Macrae observed that “it is unlikely that any Tribe or Tribes would givetrouble of a serious nature to <strong>the</strong> Government whose members had children completelyunder Government control.” 117 Duncan Campbell Scott succinctly summarizedIndian Affairs’ goals <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> schools in 1909: “It includes not only a scholasticeducation, but instruction in <strong>the</strong> means of gaining a livelihood from <strong>the</strong> soil or as amember of an industrial or mercantile community, and <strong>the</strong> substitution of Christianideals of conduct and morals <strong>for</strong> aboriginal concepts of both.” 118 The achievement ofsuch invasive and ambitious goals would require a substantial level of funding. Thiswas never <strong>for</strong>thcoming.Funding: The dream of self-supporting schoolsIn announcing <strong>the</strong> construction of <strong>the</strong> three initial industrial schools, IndianCommissioner Edgar Dewdney said that although <strong>the</strong> starting costs would be high,he could see no reason why <strong>the</strong> schools would not be largely self-supporting in a fewyears, due to <strong>the</strong> skills in farming, raising stock, and trades that were being taughtto <strong>the</strong> students. 119 In supporting an Anglican proposal <strong>for</strong> two industrial schools inManitoba, Indian Affairs Deputy Minister Lawrence Vankoughnet wrote to PrimeMinister Macdonald that it would be “well to give a Grant of money annually to each

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!