19.08.2015 Views

Honouring the Truth Reconciling for the Future

1IZC4AF

1IZC4AF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40 • <strong>Truth</strong> & Reconciliation CommissionEndnotes1. In this context, <strong>the</strong> Commission defines a “visit” as one person attending one day of oneNational Event. The Commission made daily attendance estimates of its National Events butdid not attempt to track those individuals who attended more than one day of any singleNational Event.2. Schedule N to <strong>the</strong> Settlement Agreement provides at section 1(e) that one of <strong>the</strong> goals of <strong>the</strong>Commission is to “identify sources and create as complete an historical record as possible of<strong>the</strong> IRS system and legacy.” In addition, section 11 of Schedule N provides that “Canada and <strong>the</strong>churches will provide all relevant documents in <strong>the</strong>ir possession or control to and <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> use of<strong>the</strong> <strong>Truth</strong> and Reconciliation Commission” and that Canada and <strong>the</strong> churches are required to“compile all relevant documents in an organized manner <strong>for</strong> review by <strong>the</strong> Commission and toprovide access to <strong>the</strong>ir archives <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Commission to carry out its mandate.”3. Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 ONSC 684 at para 69.4. Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 ONSC 283 (CanLII) at paras. 24–25.5. Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 ONSC 283 (CanLII) at paras. 24–25.6. Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 ONSC 283 (CanLII) at para 191.7. Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 ONSC 283 (CanLII) at para 192.8. Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 ONSC 4585 (CanLII) at para 19.9. The Catholic entities filed main appeals and <strong>the</strong> Commission and <strong>the</strong> National Centre filedcross appeals. Based on preliminary documents filed by <strong>the</strong> Catholic entities, it appears that<strong>the</strong>y intend to argue that no notice period should be ordered and that <strong>the</strong> IAP documents cannotbe archived without <strong>the</strong> consent of alleged perpetrators and o<strong>the</strong>r persons of interest. TheCommission intends to appear be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> Court of Appeal of Ontario to argue that <strong>the</strong> IAPdocuments cannot be destroyed without consulting IAP claimants.10. The Commission’s engagement with <strong>the</strong> United Nations included participation at <strong>the</strong>Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, <strong>the</strong> Expert Panel on Indigenous Issues, an ExpertSeminar on <strong>Truth</strong> Commissions and Access to Justice, and a Human Rights Council SpecialPanel on Education and Teaching History.11. A complete list of projects funded is available on <strong>the</strong> website of Aboriginal Affairs and Nor<strong>the</strong>rnDevelopment Canada at http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100015635/1100100015636.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!