12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

92 The Praeger H<strong>and</strong>book of Education <strong>and</strong> Psychology<br />

the most important historical events of the next 50 years” (para. 3). She observes that there<br />

are already signs, for example, there are more women in the U.S. Congress than 20 years ago,<br />

women are marrying other women <strong>and</strong> having children, <strong>and</strong> gay men are marrying other men<br />

<strong>and</strong> adopting children. The educational system, Gilligan reasons, will be at the center of this<br />

“historic transformation,” especially gender studies programs because these programs provide<br />

the knowledge that can foster human freedom <strong>and</strong> possibilities.<br />

Carol Gilligan <strong>and</strong> her life work embody the essence of a postformal thinker. As Joe Kincheloe<br />

<strong>and</strong> Shirley Steinberg (1999) explain, postformal thinkers are metacognitively aware <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><br />

the way that power affects their own lives <strong>and</strong> the lives of others; therefore, they apply<br />

postformal analysis to the deep structures in order to expose insidious assumptions. As Carol<br />

Gilligan’s groundbreaking research clearly demonstrates, when postformal analysis is applied<br />

to education <strong>and</strong> psychology, the implications are boundless. Gilligan’s research has had major<br />

repercussions, <strong>and</strong> it has inspired a wealth of research <strong>and</strong> scholarship not only in education <strong>and</strong><br />

psychology but also in ethics <strong>and</strong> law. Her work has led to a wide range of educational <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

projects designed to encourage girls’ voices <strong>and</strong> build on their psychological strengths. Primary<br />

<strong>and</strong> secondary schools across America have developed girl-friendly curriculums <strong>and</strong> teaching<br />

methods in order to resist the principles of femininity that were psychologically <strong>and</strong> intellectually<br />

damaging to girls for reasons that required them to be nice, to be silent, <strong>and</strong> to suppress vital<br />

part of themselves. Furthermore, her work motivated colleges to incorporate women’s studies<br />

programs, women’s campus centers, <strong>and</strong> sexual harassment policies as well as speech codes of<br />

conduct. Many popular psychology books such as Naomi Wolf’s The Beauty Myth (1991), Mary<br />

Pipher’s Reviving Ophelia (1994), <strong>and</strong> John Gray’s Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus<br />

(1998) resulted from Gilligan’s studies. It also was the impetus for the 1991 American Association<br />

of University Women’s report “Shortchanging Girls, Shortchanging America.” Moreover,<br />

Gilligan’s research was one of the driving forces behind the 1994 Gender Equity Act in Education<br />

(Wylie <strong>and</strong> Simon, 2003).<br />

In addition, postformal theorists use feminist theory in order to unify logic <strong>and</strong> emotion, unlike<br />

formalists who insist upon a separation of logic <strong>and</strong> emotion. Postformal thinkers recognize that<br />

emotions develop into “powerful thinking mechanisms that, when combined with logic, create a<br />

cognitive process that extends our ability to make sense of the universe” (Kincheloe <strong>and</strong> Steinberg,<br />

1999, p. 76). This idea is at the heart of Gilligan’s research, <strong>and</strong> accurately describes Gilligan’s<br />

theory of moral development. Finally, postformal scholars know that history is not complete <strong>and</strong><br />

democracy cannot survive without the inclusion of all voices, specifically the voices of people<br />

who have been outside the mainstream of the conversation. Carol Gilligan actively opens the<br />

conversation to “different voices” because she knows that the inclusion of all voices is an act<br />

of social justice that adds to the richness <strong>and</strong> depth of the story <strong>and</strong> promotes creativity <strong>and</strong><br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing for all because the world looks <strong>and</strong> sounds very different after suddenly seeing<br />

<strong>and</strong> hearing something that you’ve never seen or heard before.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory <strong>and</strong> Women’s Development. 1st ed.<br />

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.<br />

———. (1993). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory <strong>and</strong> Women’s Development, 2nd ed. Cambridge,<br />

MA: Harvard University Press.<br />

———. (1998, June 1). Remembering Larry. Journal of Moral Education, 27(2). Retrieved on December<br />

12, 2005, from http://sas.epnet.com/citation.asp?<br />

Gilligan, C. (2001, October 1). From White Rats to Robots the Future of Human Development. Ed. The<br />

Magazine of the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Retrieved on December 10, 2005, from<br />

http://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/features/gilligan10012001.html.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!