12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Jerome Bruner 61<br />

Eskimos seal hunting. Eventually, the controversy over the MACOS curriculum found its way<br />

to the United States Congress. Beginning in the 1970s, the National Science Foundation had to<br />

submit to the Congress for reviewing all project curriculums under budgetary consideration. As<br />

a result, MACOS lost funding <strong>and</strong> began to be removed from the many schools that adopted the<br />

curriculum. In the 1970s, Bruner’s theories began to receive criticism from across the political<br />

spectrum. Left, right, <strong>and</strong> radical writers in the field of educational psychology attacked the<br />

writings about cognition by Bruner. Shortly after the failure of the MACOS project, Bruner left<br />

the United States <strong>and</strong> began his tenure at Oxford University.<br />

Bruner continued to develop his theories about learning in many books <strong>and</strong> novels. In his<br />

later writings, Bruner became very critical of anti-intellectualism found in public opinion. One<br />

of Bruner’s concerns in education had been how to bridge the gap between the “high brows” <strong>and</strong><br />

“low brows” by developing a higher level of culture for all groups (Weltman, p. 259). Bruner<br />

wanted children to think like a scientist <strong>and</strong> thereby causing the child to appreciate the field<br />

of science. Bruner’s work helped psychologists to see the child as a social being <strong>and</strong> not as a<br />

being who developed in isolation. Bruner’s original theory of the child as an active scientist has<br />

changed over the years with his growth as a scholar. His concerns <strong>and</strong> writings have been focused<br />

more on the social activism <strong>and</strong> cultural studies. In his writings today, Bruner can be viewed as<br />

a poststructuralist. He has moved away from the formalism in his earlier writings <strong>and</strong> now tends<br />

to analyze statements <strong>and</strong> writings as forms of narrative text. Bruner continues to write about the<br />

link between psychology <strong>and</strong> education. His latest concern is with cultural psychology <strong>and</strong> its<br />

impact on education.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Bruner, J. (1960). The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.<br />

Bruner, J. (1983). In Search of Mind: Essays in Autobiography. New York: Harper & Row.<br />

Hevern, V. W. (2004, April). Key Theorists: Jerome S Bruner. Narrative Psychology: Internet <strong>and</strong> Resource<br />

Guide. Retrieved on December 10, 2005, from the Le Moyne College Web Site: http://web.lemoyne.<br />

edu/∼hevern/nr-theorists/bruner jerome s.html.<br />

Smith, M. K. (2002). Jerome S. Bruner <strong>and</strong> the Process of Education. The Encyclopedia of Informal<br />

Education. Retrieved on December 10, 2005, from http://www.infed.org/thinkers/bruner.htm. Last<br />

updated: January 28, 2005.<br />

Weltman, B. D. (1995). Debating Dewey: The Social Ideas of American Educators Since World War II an<br />

Examination of Arthur Bestor, Jerome Bruner, Paul Goodman, John Goodlad, <strong>and</strong> Mortimer Adler<br />

(Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, 1995). Dissertations Abstract<br />

International, 56/09, 3479.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!