12.12.2012 Views

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

Educational Psychology—Limitations and Possibilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Recognizing Students among <strong>Educational</strong> Authorities 745<br />

in educational relationships <strong>and</strong> institutions that have supported <strong>and</strong> been maintained by this<br />

disinclination <strong>and</strong> inability.<br />

Judging from the little but important work that has been done in this area, profound changes<br />

in role <strong>and</strong> relationship as well as in learning can result when adults listen to students. When<br />

adults listen to students, they can begin to see the world from those students’ perspectives, make<br />

what they teach more accessible to students, conceptualize teaching, learning, <strong>and</strong> the ways<br />

we study them as more collaborative processes, even change what they teach <strong>and</strong> who they<br />

are. When students are taken seriously <strong>and</strong> listened to as knowledgeable participants in important<br />

conversations about schooling, they feel motivated to participate constructively in their education.<br />

Because they experience daily the effects of existing educational practices, students have unique<br />

<strong>and</strong> valuable views on education that, when elicited <strong>and</strong> shared, have the potential to transform<br />

schools into institutions responsive to rather than disconnected from the modern world.<br />

Over the last decade some educators <strong>and</strong> educational researchers have attempted to create<br />

new roles for students <strong>and</strong> to challenge traditional notions of who has relevant knowledge about<br />

education. These long overdue efforts are important both for the essential ways in which they<br />

attend to student perspectives as well as for the ways they throw into relief the work that remains to<br />

be done. In the following discussion I evoke the historical images of students that have contributed<br />

to their exclusion from conversations about educational policy, practice, <strong>and</strong> reform. I then outline<br />

a variety of attempts to attend to student perspectives on educational practice undertaken over<br />

the last decade. I conclude with a detailed discussion of how attitudes <strong>and</strong> institutional structures<br />

need to change if we are to more consistently <strong>and</strong> fully recognize students among those with<br />

authority on educational practice.<br />

HISTORICAL IMAGES OF STUDENTS<br />

Although it is rarely articulated as such, the most basic premise upon which different approaches<br />

to educational policy <strong>and</strong> practice rest is trust—whether adults trust young people to be good (or<br />

not), to have <strong>and</strong> use relevant knowledge (or not), <strong>and</strong> to be responsible (or not). The educational<br />

institutions <strong>and</strong> practices that have prevailed in the United States both historically <strong>and</strong> currently<br />

reflect a basic lack of trust in young people <strong>and</strong> have evolved to keep students under control <strong>and</strong> in<br />

their place as the largely passive recipients of what adults decide should constitute an education.<br />

Keeping the young under control <strong>and</strong> in their place took the form it has to this day after the<br />

industrial revolution in the nineteenth century. The national obsession with efficient production<br />

in all realms plugged learners into bolted-down desks <strong>and</strong> lock-step curricula through which they<br />

were guided by the teacher-as-skilled-engineer. More progressive, humanistic conceptualizations<br />

of learners based on trust in their capacities <strong>and</strong> inclinations have always run parallel to the<br />

impulse to contain <strong>and</strong> control young bodies <strong>and</strong> minds, but they have remained alternative, not<br />

the norm. Arguments that students should be nurtured <strong>and</strong> allowed to learn in their own ways<br />

at their own pace, child-centered notions of education, <strong>and</strong> alternative models, such as those in<br />

Waldorf <strong>and</strong> Montessori schools, run counter to but do not displace the dominant view of students<br />

<strong>and</strong> approaches to their education. Even these more progressive approaches do not cede students’<br />

authority comparable to adults’ in imagining <strong>and</strong> designing educational opportunities.<br />

A COLLECTION OF EFFORTS TO RECOGNIZE AND RESPOND TO YOUNG<br />

PEOPLE’S PERSPECTIVES<br />

Calls to listen <strong>and</strong> respond to what students have to say about school have sounded intermittently<br />

since the early 1990s. Since then, a variety of efforts have been made to attend more carefully<br />

<strong>and</strong> to respond to student perspectives. In the following section I will briefly outline these

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!